After this segment, you
can see Jim's
Sudden:Death picks
here...
. . . .
.
JJC:
Tomorrow, the SEC will
decide whether or not it
will continue to enforce its
so-called emergency rule to
protect a group of 19 banks
and financials stocks from
the endless bear raids
caused by naked shorting...
Never mind the fact that
selling the stock short
without first finding and
borrowing the shares, naked
shorting, had long been
considered illegal by most
market participants... This
may not sound like a big
deal to you... In fact, it
probably sounds like a
boring little technicality
that only even covers 19
stocks, probably you don't
own any of them... But, in
fact, the SEC's decision, if
it goes the wrong way,
meaning it stops protecting
these stocks by enforcing
the law, could cost you a
fortune and make you want to
permantly abandon the stock
market... And, to be honest,
I wouldn't blame you... I
wouldn't blame you for
feeling that way either,
even though I'm the single
most loudest proponent that
you should be in stocks...
Now, as bad as these prices
for the banks were today,
believe me, we will see much
lower ones for the
financials Wednesday, if the
SEC does the wrong thing
tomorrow... If the SEC
decides to scuttle its
emergency protection, then
these banks and financials
go back, back to the way
they were July 15th, 16th,
17th, I mean, where it just
is a free fire zone... Where
they will be carpet bombed
by short sellers, who simply
don't play by the rules...
Tomorrow is a landmark day
where we find out wheter the
SEC is returning to its
stupid, sorry to be so
blunt, laize faire attitude
that allows short sellers to
destroy your stocks through
a combination of endless
shorting, rumor mongering,
regardless if the shorts can
even borrow the stocks that
they're selling... Something
I know I had to do when I
was a hedgefund manager and
something I considered a
bastion to protect you, the
longs, regular people who
own stocks... Why does this
matter so much?... All
right, it has to do with the
character of the people, of
some of the people, who are
doing this... Hedgefunds are
often diabolical... Some of
them, the bad ones, need to
be in order to make their
performance bogeys, bad
actors... They need to do
the wrong thing... The
poorly run, less intelligent
hedgefund managers need to
use every trick in the book
to make money and these less
than skilled players have
been resorting to value
destroying tactics that I
regard as being blantently
anti-you, including naked
shorting, making money by
shorting stocks and then
banging them down without
even trying to borrow them
first... This disgraceful
tactic of naked shorting,
long considered to be
illegal, but somehow not
enforced by the SEC, which
is supposed to be leveling
the playing field for you,
or at least enforcing the
laws in the books, has
played right into the hands
of those hedgefunds that
need to make money at your
expense, because they're
just not good at doing it
any other way... It's a
simple thing to do... One of
these hedgefunds gets to
short a stock...
Let's use the example of
Lehman Brothers
(LEH)...
Then it spreads a lot of
rumors about LEH saying that
people aren't going to trade
with them or are pulling
their money out with them...
And that raids the stock...
People then start selling
it, including the funds that
scare people and have it
short... They relentlessly
sell it down, even if it
hasn't been borrowed yet...
You know, I used to call
this blitzgreiging, when I
sold this kind of operation
in the 90's... And it
worked... Back in 1990 it
helped destroy a lot of
banks and savings and
loans... Now, some of them
were derserving, but not all
of them... It's been widely
suggested to have been at
work when LEH plummeted from
the $40's to the teens...
Althought, LEH, of course,
helped the shorts immensly
by disappointing on its
outlook and numbers... Now
the SEC decided to put a
temporary stop to this
unsportsman-like knocking
down of your stocks, and
posted the 19 list... They
were supposed to be
protected from something
that they really protected
from anyway... You know, you
can read the statue in a lot
of ways... I read it that
you were protected from
it... Or you would've been
at least protected from it,
if the SEC hadn't stopped
enforcing the rules...
Because the SEC has been so
lax, it's been possible to
short... Let's just use this
wild example, okay?... You
could short 300 million
shares of a company, even if
it only had 200 million
shares traded... And believe
me, that kind of
overwhelming force, the
overwhelming selling the
shorts tried to do, pretty
much to every stock on this
listed 19 was making it
impossible for the companies
behind the stock to raise
more money by selling
shares, as the shares were
constanlty being mashed
lower... This was a
brilliant way, it is a
brilliant way to wreck a
bank... Banks are fragile...
Credit is fragile... The
hedgefunds would knock their
stocks down low enough that
the banks had no ability to
raise money... And then
these inscroupulous
investors would spread
rumors about the bank...
Now, they're starting to
crack down on that,
apparently... I'll believe
it when I see it... I
believe it when I see the
tapes... I'll believe it
when they go after some of
them... When the SEC moved
to protect these 19 banks
and financial stocks from
naked shorting, there was an
immediate cessation in the
seemingly endless, viscious
circle down... In fact,
these stocks rallied
tremendously at a much
higher level...
There was just one
problem... The SEC left
other impotant financials
off the list, including,
inexplicably, the largest
thrift, pathetic Washington
Mutual, run by General
Custer Killinger, okay?...
When this one was left out
of the arch, it was
immediately pummled by the
shorts... It became the
victim of all sorts of
baseless rumors... Rumors
tehat could have really
pounded Washington Mutual's
stock... It still might go
that way if it's not
protected... The same goes
for AIG, that was off the
list... And that was
visciously attacked by the
shorts, they pushed it all
down... Nat City too... And
I know Merill was down
really badly, and that's
protected, but it's still
up, although barely, from
where it was... Despite the
fact that the 19 financials
getting the so called
special protection that
ought to be provided to
every stock, held up or
actually went higher, and
the ones left off the list
got shredded by the
shorts... One of the SEC
comissioners is actually
questioning if the emergency
rule protecting those 19
financials had any
effecacy... I mean, you
can't make this stuff up...
I know, bank stocks got hit
four percent today... The
vast bulk of them, including
Lehman Brothers
(LEH),
Citigroup (C),
Bank of America (BAC),
and
Wachovia Corp. (WB)
are still well above where
they traded before the SEC
intervened... Maybe that
should help the comissioner
make up his mind... What's
Mad Money's view?... Well,
we think that no stock
should be the target of
naked shorting... We think
they should role things back
to the way they were in the
1990's when all stocks were
protected from naked
shorting and it was enforced
by the SEC, not just 19...
You know, it worked just
fine then, I mean, what's
the deal here?... But this
measure would protect you
from the most pretacious and
deperative hedgefunds... And
of course, what are they
doing?... They are now
lobbying the trade group,
the hedgefund trade group is
lobbying to get rid of this
protection... I think the
hedgefund trade group is
kind of like the groups that
were featured in the movie,
Thank you for Smoking...
The pro-smoking, I mean, the
hedgefund lobby, is saying
that the SEC is making it
too difficult to trade,
meaning too difficult to
take money from you... And
the brokers, who are clearly
their own worst enemies,
given how the shorts are
operating endlessly on
Merill and LEH, are actually
crying that the cost to
institute the rule are too
high for them, for the
customers... And the trade
groups are worried that
short selling will now be
too cumbersome... Wow,
there's an interest worth
protecting... How is there
even a choice between
stopping market manipulating
bear raids and making it a
little less cumbersome to
short stocks... You should
be protected, not shot at
like bambi's mommy... How
did Bambi's mommy faire?...
Not as good as thumper...
. . . .
.
The Bottom Line!:
Tomorrow we find out if the
SEC's recent good behavior
was just a blip and the
remain on the side of the
rafscalion short sellers,
who need to be able to raid
your stocks to win, or if
this SEC is finally like the
SEC in the 90's and about to
level the playing field back
in your favor.
■
Stock Snapshots - Includes
all stocks mentioned above
■
Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock
STOCK
SYMBOL
Closing
price
that
day
Opening
price
next
day
Full Company
Name/Comments
(see comments above for
each)
Most popular
investing books ordered:
(click any book to see at
Amazon.com)
We need your help!
If you find our service valuable, your
donation is critically helpful to support
our operating costs and is
MUCH appreciated!
(click below to donate)
We are serving thousands
of
new visitors every day and our costs are
growing as well. Thank you for your
support & generosity!
Final Segment 2
Final Segment
2 Title:
'Mad Mail'...
. . . .
.
Featured
Stock(s):
See comments below...
After this segment, you
can see Jim's
Sudden:Death picks
here...
. . . .
.
■
Stock Snapshots - Includes
all stocks mentioned above
■
Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock
STOCK
SYMBOL
Closing
price
that
day
Opening
price
next
day
Full Company
Name/Comments
(see comments above for
each)
Q:
Jim, HOG just
revealed its
2009 bike
line-up, which
includes a
pretty cool new
Trike to target
the aging boomer
demographic! I
think this is a
pretty smart
play for them.
Do you think HOG
should be a buy
on this news?
JJC:
HOG is having a
hard time...
It's got great
management, I
think it will
see it's way
through it...
The dividend is
almost 4%...
This stock has
gone down for a
very long
time... And I
think
motorcycles are
back... Now
here's the thing
to recognize...
You don't need
to necessarily
buy a beautiful
HOG, which is
one of the
reasons why
people don't
want to bottom
fish, but I've
got to tell
you... I think
the company is
doing everything
right, they've
stayed on
course... It
will eventually
be a buy.
Q:
Jim, Brokerages
such as
Merrill Lynch
(MER),
Charles Schwab Corp. (SCHW)
and
Lehman Brothers
(LEH)
have been beaten
up since the
housing mess
started to
unravel last
July. Now that
we are seeing a
potential bottom
in teh market,
is it time to
buy the most
beaten up stcok
of the bunch,
E*TRADE
(ETFC)?
JJC:
ETFC has a
really
unbelievable
disclosure...
They're a very
honest, good
company... They
have a lot of
home equity
loan... And I'm
more concerned
about home
equity loan than
other thing... I
need to see some
stablization of
home equity loan
before I wanna
pull the trigger
there... SCHW
had a great
quarter, by the
way... So did
TD AMERITRADE (AMTD).
Q:
Booyaaaah from
AZ! Our
over-priced
advisor put us
in AIG at $72,
then suggested
we buy more at
$48. Now it's
down so much it
may well be a
good value. What
do you think??
JJC:
First of all,
this is a very
hard market, so
before I just
slam the guy,
although I did
put this in the
Sell Block in
the $60's... A
lot of people
failed AIG was
really cheap...
I think AIG, I
said that the
other day, I
think it goes
lower... Below
$20 I think it
represents great
value... They're
about to report,
let's see what
they say, maybe
we can upgrade
it...
Q:
Booyah from
Virginia! Jim
Cramer, what do
you think about
investing in
China,
specifically the
pork industry? I
think AG FEED
industries
(FEED) is
looking pretty
good right now!
They are really
expanding and
pork is big
business in
China.
JJC:
I'm not
investing with
the Chinese
communists... I
just got in
trouble
investing with
the Russian
communists...
Putin...
[
end of final segment ]
Go to the SUDDEN:DEATH
SEGMENT from
tonight's showhere >>
See current quotes on Yahoo!
Finance from
tonight's show stocks
here >>
Symbol keys:
A Charitable Trust stock.
- An asterisk next to a
stock symbol indicates that
Jim mentioned it is a stock
that he manages within
his
charitable trust portfolio.
You can see the complete
portfolio
of stocks
here >>
Thumbs up - indicates
he would buy the stock or,
at the very least, not sell
the stock. We do our
best to interpret Jim's
opinion on stocks, as we
think it is indicated by his
comments during the show.
Please read his comments to
decide for yourself.
Thumbs down -
indicates he has said not to
buy or to sell the stock,
based on his comments
We do our best to interpret
Jim's opinion on stocks, as
we think it is indicated by
his comments during the
show. Please read his
comments to decide for
yourself.
Back up the truck -
indicated by Jim, when he
says the stock is so good,
that he would do a
'mon-back' on the stock...
In other words, this is the
sound someone would say to a
truck driver, "Come on
back... " as he is "backing
up the truck" to load up on
his cargo. Translation
for buying stocks:
This recommendation by Jim
indicates that, after you do
your own
homework on the stock,
you should feel comfortable
loading up on it, as it is
in a good position to be
bought at this point.
Stumped. - Of the
2,000+ stocks that Jim
Cramer has in his head, for
which he has an informed
opinion, he sometimes comes
across a caller with a stock
he does not know well enough
to opine on... He then
indicates he is stumped and
will have to come back to
it, after he does some
homework of his own on
the stock. This
usually occurs during the
Lightning Round, when Jim
does not know in advance who
is calling, or what their
stock question is about.
Definitions of key phrases
used by Jim, known as
"Cramerisms":
Definition: 'Pull the
trigger' is Jim's phrase for making
the decision at that point to trade -
either to 'buy' or
to 'sell' (although he
usually uses the phrase for
buying), as if to say you
should feel comfortable
enough to make the final
decision without looking
back...
Definition: 'Ring
the Register' is Jim's phrase for
selling a stock, and making
it a final sale, that you
should not look back on.
Put it behind you.
Definition:'Let It Come In' indicates how you
may wait for it to pull back, or have the
stock price come down briefly, as your
chance (after letting it come in) to buy
the rest of your position (i.e., total
number of shares you own in that stock).
Definition:'backing it up'
or 'doing a 'mon-back' is Jim's
phrase for the metaphor of backing up a
truck to load up on a stock by buying
it. 'Mon-back is short for the
imaginary worker saying, 'Come on
back...' as the truck is backing up to
receive its load... Notice that we use
the little truck icon to indicate where
Jim has mentioned this.
Translation for buying
stocks: This
recommendation by Jim
indicates that, after you do
your own
homework on the stock,
you should feel comfortable
loading up on it, as it is
in a good position to be
bought at this point.
See more
"Cramerisms" & other
financial phrases
here >>
Helpful Websites:
See the stocks currently
known to be in Jim Cramer's
Charitable Trust at:
Stock Homework 101:
This is an excellent
upcoming site that provides
resources and links to help
you do that homework that
Jim Cramer recommends after
hearing his suggestions...
FastMoneyRecap:
This site will be a quick
summary of recommendations
made by the great Fast Money
TV show crew, that will
offer you a unique service,
to compare their picks to
Jim Cramer's past comments
about those stocks.