|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
 |
| |
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
Tuesday, 06/10/08
Posted 06/10/08, 8:43
pm ET |
(Scroll down to see Jim's
comments below) |
|
| |
| |
|
Today's date:
Tuesday, 06/10/08 |
|
| |
Dow Jones: |
12,289 |
+ 9 |
| |
NASDAQ: |
|
2,448 |
- 10 |
| |
S&P 500: |
|
1,358 |
- 3 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Opening Segment 1
Title: |
'Texas T-REXX' |
|
. . . .
. |
|
Featured Stock(s): |
Rex Energy Corp.
(REXX)
See REXX's official
website
here.
See the Yahoo!
Finance profile for
REXX
here.
See Opening Segment 2,
below...
|
|
|
After this segment, you
can see Jim's Lightning
Round picks
here... |
JJC:
It's wildcat week on Mad
Money... The wildcatters
I'm talking about are the
oil and gas companies that
drill in new places...
finding new oil. This
whole week is "There Will
Be Blood" week. Just watch
that movie if you want a
more detailed... look at
the business...
Now, if you think we've
even got a prayer of
having cheap oil, these
wildcatters are the
companies that could make
it happen, because they're
the ones trying to find
new oil and increasing
supply. And the problem
that we have is that
there's great demand, but
no new supply...
Wildcatters may be the
best way to play $131
oil... because, at lower
prices for oil, these
stocks tend not to work.
They're too risky. They
drill a lot... they may
not find anything... It
becomes a difficult
proposition.
It is expensive to drill
and search for new oil.
But, as long as oil prices
stay sky-high, we can't
get enough wildcatters on
Mad Money... The stocks
have become viable under
the umbrella of high
oil...
That's why, today, I'm
recommending... it's a
little guy... Rex
Energy Corp. (REXX).
That's my next
wildcatter... REXX.
. . . .
.
Right now, REXX has 16
million barrels of oil
equivalence of proved
reserves... 80% of those
reserves are oil, so it's
benefiting from these
higher prices. Now, a lot
of its new exploration is
in the Marcellus Shale,
which is all natural gas.
So, going forward, REXX
should have more balance
between oil and natural
gas in its reserves. Don't
forget, 2008 is the year
of natural gas on Mad
Money...
Now, REXX also has 2800 of
oil equivalence of daily
production. Management
thinks REXX has potential
reserves of 232 million
barrels of oil
equivalence... That's 14.5
times its crude reserves
and, if they're right, it
would mean this stock...
this wildcatter... should
have huge upside.
. . . .
.
But I like REXX for
another reason. It's
actually a "new tech"
wildcatter. REXX is
running an enhanced oil
project. The company's
using a technology called
alkali surfactant polymer
(i.e., ASP)... flooding...
they flood this, where
chemicals are pumped into
the ground to help bring
out the oil at its
Lawrence Field play.
REXX is doing two tests of
this technology. They've
injected the chemicals
into the soil, and we
should see the results of
this in the third quarter.
This whole project could
yield 84 million barrels
of oil, which could be
worth... Again, I know
these numbers sound big,
but you have to understand
that wildcatting at $120
(cost per barrel of oil)
is not wildcatting at
$40... This would be worth
$40 a share to REXX's $27
stock, if it's a
success... and this is
just part of their
business. It's potentially
a $40 stock, masquerading
as a $27 one.
. . . .
.
And we haven't even talked
about REXX's exposure to
Cramer-fave Marcellus
Shale... which people
talked about a little bit,
and it totally stopped.
I'm telling you, this is
the future... The
Marcellus Shale is the
current big thing in
natural gas, and REXX owns
48,000 net acres in the
Marcellus Shale region,
and they're planning to
buy another 30-50,000 by
the end of the year.
Already, REXX has 72
million barrels of
equivalent reserves from
280 vertical drilling
locations in the Marcellus
Shale. This is THE
Marcellus Shale play,
other than
Chesapeake Energy Corp. (CHK),
which is another stock I
really like. The company
did a secondary (stock
offering) to fund its land
acquisitions in Marcellus
at $20.75, giving buyers a
30% gain. When one of
these exploration and
production companies does
a secondary to buy
Marcellus Shale land, I
think there's a good
chance you want to get in
on that action.
. . . .
.
We've got some oil patch
credibility here... kind
of like street cred...
when it comes to the
Marcellus Shale story.
We've already had a great
winner for you... one that
I took a lot of heat on in
my email... It was
Atlas Energy Resources LLC
(ATN)...
I recommended that on
March 31, because of its
Marcellus Shale exposure,
and its up 28% since then.
I think REXX follows right
in its footsteps, and the
footsteps of
Chesapeake (CHK),
which is the most vigorous
driller in Marcellus...
Now, most of the reserve
estimates for REXX... they
seem quite conservative to
me, all right... The
Street is assuming that
the unconventional
technology that REXX is
using (i.e., ASP), will
only have a 33% success
rate, and they're just as
cautious... they're
downright bearish... about
its success in Marcellus,
which makes absolutely no
sense to me, as the
Marcellus Shale has been a
great moneymaker for so
many other companies...
Here's the bottom line on
REXX...
. . . .
.
The Bottom Line!:
Rex Energy Corp. (REXX)
is a wildcatter, using new
technology to get at
hard-to-reach oil. I
think the Street's
underestimating its
potential. And I'm
calling REXX a triple-buy,
particularly because, as
much as you might hear
that oil's coming down, it
ain't going to come down
nearly enough to make REXX
an expensive stock.
. . . .
.
| |
|
| |
|
■ |
Stock Snapshots - Includes
all stocks mentioned above |
■ |
|
| |
|
|
Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock |
STOCK
SYMBOL |
Closing
price
that
day |
Opening
price
next
day |
Full Company
Name/Comments
(see comments above for
each) |
|

|
REXX |
27.05 |
29.23 |
Rex Energy Corp. (REXX)
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
See all of tonight's stocks'
latest quotes on
Yahoo! Finance |
|
Most popular
investing books ordered:
(click any book to see at
Amazon.com) |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We need your help!
If you find our service valuable, your
donation is critically helpful to support
our operating costs and is
MUCH appreciated!
(click below to donate) |
We are serving thousands
of
new visitors every day and our costs are
growing as well. Thank you for your
support & generosity!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
Mutual-Fund-Holdings.com
NEW RESOURCE!
See Ken Heebner's CGM
Focus Fund
Top 25 holdings - The No.
3 Top-Performing Mutual
Fund in 2007
|
|
Opening Segment 2
Title: |
'Policy of Truth' |
|
. . . .
. |
|
Featured Stock(s): |
General comments
about the Fed policy
actions. No
specific stock picks.
|
|
|
After this segment, you
can see Jim's Lightning
Round picks
here... |
JJC: Don't be
fooled by the rally in the
banks today. I believe
that these stocks are in
real trouble, and obvious
trouble, courtesy of the
friends at the Federal
Reserve... who are all
back in their ivory tower
who are thinking about
raising rates to fight
inflation... something
that I think could utterly
wreck nearly every major
bank out there...
especially ones choking on
home equity loans, which
are defaulting quicker
than I can down a cheap
bottle of scotch on a
linoleum floor on a big
down day...
Everyday, we get more and
more awful data from the
financials... Yesterday,
it was LEH... WM... Today,
it's UBS. The housing
crisis is so bad that now
we're hearing that JPM is
suddenly troubled by the
losses by the BSC bond
portfolio it bought, even
after those gigantic loan
guarantees from the
Feds... That is new news
by the way...
We are now more than a
year into the crisis, and
what are we hearing from
our nation's financial
leaders... the men who are
supposed to save us from
financial catastrophe?...
Here's Ben Bernanke (Fed
Chairman) yesterday...
"The risk that the economy
has entered a substantial
downturn appears to have
diminished over the last
month or so"...
Really? Is he seeing the
same things I'm seeing? Do
we inhabit the same
universe?...
Honestly, this guy is
sounding like Herbert
Hoover every day...
Seriously, here's Hoover
in 1930 (just before the
Great Depression)... "I am
convinced that we have now
passed the worst, and with
continued unity of effort,
we shall rapidly recover."
These quotations, to me,
are both
interchangeable...
I hope that, this time, it
isn't equally as
catastrophic.
After a period where it
seemed like the Fed was no
longer asleep at the
wheel, I'm once again
convinced that they are
beginning to unlearn what
I thought they had learned
the hard way... through
almost $500 billion in
losses that I firmly
believe could have been
avoided, had the Fed taken
swift action...
The worry for them, once
again, unbelievably...
inflation. The same excuse
they used to avoid dealing
with the problem when it
first surfaced... But, and
I'll say this real slow
for the benefit of the Fed
and the Treasury
Department for that
matter... You cannot fight
inflation, and stop a
housing depression at the
same time... You can't be
worried about both
simultaneously. If they
continue to take the...
let-them-have-their-cake-and-eat-it-too
approach, our economy is
headed straight for the
financial guillotine...
Last year was the year to
cut rates big!... And let
people re-finance their
mortgages and give the
banks a chance to play the
yield curve to rebuild
capital... a la 1990... a
scenario we've outlined
repeatedly on Mad Money...
We all know the story...
we know what they did...
They blew that chance to
avert the crisis because
they were worried about,
yes, inflation... Bernanke
and the rest of the Fed...
You see, they're trying to
take a middle road that
does not exist... They
have no conviction, and
maybe no idea of the
consequences of their
actions... They just keep
vacillating, putting out
different stories, giving
different speeches...
failing to fix inflation
or the housing-induced
recession... but they
don't get it...
If they want to fight
inflation... if that is
Bernanke's chief goal,
then here's what he needs
to do...
Frankly, he needs to
destroy the economy, in
order to save it...
He needs to make people so
poor, that they can't
afford to pay for
gasoline, because this
particular strand of
inflation is energy-based,
not wage cost or
housing-related.
Now the government could
take care of a big chunk
of food inflation by
killing that nasty and
stupid ethanol mandate,
where we trade 30% of our
corn... what the animals
eat... chicken, beef...
for 3% of our gasoline...
That's right. And I
believe that federal
policy... mandated by the
President and supported by
congress... is causing the
real inflation for food...
That's why the July 4th
barbecue is going to be so
tough... the same with
Father's Day...
And, at the same time, we
have the Federal Reserve
that's noodling on whether
to raise rates and level
the economy to fight that
inflation...
All right, if they urged
the elimination of
corn-based ethanol, they
would do more for the
cause of lower inflation
than they would by raising
rates... and they'd also
have the added advantage
of not increasing the
likelihood that you'd lose
your job.
What we have now is a
choice. And it's a choice
neither the Federal
Reserve nor the Treasury
Department seems willing
to make... They can either
cut down inflation and
take in exchange what I
expect to be a severe
recession... absolutely
maul American
businesses... so they will
use less energy...
brutalize the American
homeowner, so he can't pay
his mortgage... and then
merge all the banks, as
they start to fail, under
the weight of all these
defaults...
Or they can solve the
housing conundrum first,
and put the rate hikes in
a drawer until we're
finished.
You see, they're trying to
do both, but that's simply
impossible. They want to
be tough on oil-based
inflation, which won't
work... and bet that the
housing depression is
over. That's a bad bet.
These problems have to be
tackled sequentially or
they won't be tackled at
all... One or the other...
they've got to pick. I
hear them all day on our
network... they're saying
both.
There have been some
benefits from their
indecision for
Cramericans... the bull
market in energy and
energy-related stocks that
have to go higher with the
commodity. If Bernanke
wants to raise interest
rates to kill that, and to
create mass unemployment,
that's his prerogative. It
seems he can't make up his
mind.
It shouldn't be this
way... these guys are
supposed to be clued in...
but it is. And it has
been... We can't keep
denying the obvious. They
haven't been able to
choose between trying to
stop oil inflation, and
trying to combat house
price depreciation, and
that's the most dangerous
non-choice of all.
So we have a nonsensical
policy that seeks to
create inflation and kill
it at the same time... one
that I believe will result
in the worst
alternative... both
inflation and recession.
. . . .
.
| | | | |