Tuesday, 06/10/08
Posted 06/10/08,  8:43 pm ET

(Scroll down to see Jim's comments below)

 
 
Today's date:  Tuesday, 06/10/08

  Dow Jones: 12,289   + 9
  NASDAQ:   2,448   - 10
  S&P 500:   1,358    - 3
 
 
 
 
 
First Segment
 
Opening Segment 1 Title: 'Texas T-REXX'

.  .  .  .  .

Featured Stock(s): Rex Energy Corp. (REXX)

See REXX's official website here.

See the Yahoo! Finance profile for REXX here.


See Opening Segment 2, below...
 
After this segment, you can see Jim's Lightning Round picks here...

        
JJC:    It's wildcat week on Mad Money... The wildcatters I'm talking about are the oil and gas companies that drill in new places... finding new oil. This whole week is "There Will Be Blood" week. Just watch that movie if you want a more detailed... look at the business...

Now, if you think we've even got a prayer of having cheap oil, these wildcatters are the companies that could make it happen, because they're the ones trying to find new oil and increasing supply. And the problem that we have is that there's great demand, but no new supply...

Wildcatters may be the best way to play $131 oil... because, at lower prices for oil, these stocks tend not to work. They're too risky. They drill a lot... they may not find anything... It becomes a difficult proposition.

It is expensive to drill and search for new oil. But, as long as oil prices stay sky-high, we can't get enough wildcatters on Mad Money... The stocks have become viable under the umbrella of high oil...

That's why, today, I'm recommending... it's a little guy... Rex Energy Corp. (REXX). That's my next wildcatter... REXX.

.  .  .  .  .


Right now, REXX has 16 million barrels of oil equivalence of proved reserves... 80% of those reserves are oil, so it's benefiting from these higher prices. Now, a lot of its new exploration is in the Marcellus Shale, which is all natural gas. So, going forward, REXX should have more balance between oil and natural gas in its reserves. Don't forget, 2008 is the year of natural gas on Mad Money...

Now, REXX also has 2800 of oil equivalence of daily production. Management thinks REXX has potential reserves of 232 million barrels of oil equivalence... That's 14.5 times its crude reserves and, if they're right, it would mean this stock... this wildcatter... should have huge upside.

.  .  .  .  .


But I like REXX for another reason. It's actually a "new tech" wildcatter. REXX is running an enhanced oil project. The company's using a technology called alkali surfactant polymer (i.e., ASP)... flooding... they flood this, where chemicals are pumped into the ground to help bring out the oil at its Lawrence Field play.

REXX is doing two tests of this technology. They've injected the chemicals into the soil, and we should see the results of this in the third quarter. This whole project could yield 84 million barrels of oil, which could be worth... Again, I know these numbers sound big, but you have to understand that wildcatting at $120 (cost per barrel of oil) is not wildcatting at $40... This would be worth $40 a share to REXX's $27 stock, if it's a success... and this is just part of their business. It's potentially a $40 stock, masquerading as a $27 one.

.  .  .  .  .


And we haven't even talked about REXX's exposure to Cramer-fave Marcellus Shale... which people talked about a little bit, and it totally stopped.

I'm telling you, this is the future... The Marcellus Shale is the current big thing in natural gas, and REXX owns 48,000 net acres in the Marcellus Shale region, and they're planning to buy another 30-50,000 by the end of the year. Already, REXX has 72 million barrels of equivalent reserves from 280 vertical drilling locations in the Marcellus Shale. This is THE Marcellus Shale play, other than Chesapeake Energy Corp. (CHK), which is another stock I really like. The company did a secondary (stock offering) to fund its land acquisitions in Marcellus at $20.75, giving buyers a 30% gain. When one of these exploration and production companies does a secondary to buy Marcellus Shale land, I think there's a good chance you want to get in on that action.

.  .  .  .  .


We've got some oil patch credibility here... kind of like street cred... when it comes to the Marcellus Shale story. We've already had a great winner for you... one that I took a lot of heat on in my email... It was Atlas Energy Resources LLC (ATN)... I recommended that on March 31, because of its Marcellus Shale exposure, and its up 28% since then. I think REXX follows right in its footsteps, and the footsteps of Chesapeake (CHK), which is the most vigorous driller in Marcellus...

Now, most of the reserve estimates for REXX... they seem quite conservative to me, all right... The Street is assuming that the unconventional technology that REXX is using (i.e., ASP), will only have a 33% success rate, and they're just as cautious... they're downright bearish... about its success in Marcellus, which makes absolutely no sense to me, as the Marcellus Shale has been a great moneymaker for so many other companies...

Here's the bottom line on REXX...

.  .  .  .  .

The Bottom Line!:      Rex Energy Corp. (REXX) is a wildcatter, using new technology to get at hard-to-reach oil.  I think the Street's underestimating its potential.  And I'm calling REXX a triple-buy, particularly because, as much as you might hear that oil's coming down, it ain't going to come down nearly enough to make REXX an expensive stock.

.  .  .  .  .

 

   
 

Stock Snapshots - Includes all stocks mentioned above

 

 

Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock

STOCK
SYMBOL

Closing
price
that
day

Opening
price
next
day

Full Company Name/Comments
(see comments above for each)


REXX

27.05

29.23

Rex Energy Corp. (REXX)


 

 



See all of tonight's stocks' latest quotes on Yahoo! Finance



Most popular
investing books ordered:
(click any book to see at Amazon.com)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


We need your help!
If you find our service valuable, your donation is critically helpful to support
our operating costs and is MUCH appreciated!
(click below to donate)

We are serving thousands of new visitors every day and our costs are growing as well.  Thank you for your support & generosity!


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 
 
 
 

Mutual-Fund-Holdings.com
NEW RESOURCE!  See Ken Heebner's CGM Focus Fund
Top 25 holdings - The No. 3 Top-Performing Mutual Fund in 2007


 
 
Second Segment
 
 
Opening Segment 2 Title: 'Policy of Truth'

.  .  .  .  .

Featured Stock(s): General comments about the Fed policy actions.  No specific stock picks.

 
After this segment, you can see Jim's Lightning Round picks here...


JJC:   Don't be fooled by the rally in the banks today. I believe that these stocks are in real trouble, and obvious trouble, courtesy of the friends at the Federal Reserve... who are all back in their ivory tower who are thinking about raising rates to fight inflation... something that I think could utterly wreck nearly every major bank out there... especially ones choking on home equity loans, which are defaulting quicker than I can down a cheap bottle of scotch on a linoleum floor on a big down day...

Everyday, we get more and more awful data from the financials... Yesterday, it was LEH... WM... Today, it's UBS. The housing crisis is so bad that now we're hearing that JPM is suddenly troubled by the losses by the BSC bond portfolio it bought, even after those gigantic loan guarantees from the Feds... That is new news by the way...

We are now more than a year into the crisis, and what are we hearing from our nation's financial leaders... the men who are supposed to save us from financial catastrophe?... Here's Ben Bernanke (Fed Chairman) yesterday... "The risk that the economy has entered a substantial downturn appears to have diminished over the last month or so"...

Really? Is he seeing the same things I'm seeing? Do we inhabit the same universe?...

Honestly, this guy is sounding like Herbert Hoover every day... Seriously, here's Hoover in 1930 (just before the Great Depression)... "I am convinced that we have now passed the worst, and with continued unity of effort, we shall rapidly recover." These quotations, to me, are both interchangeable...

I hope that, this time, it isn't equally as catastrophic.

After a period where it seemed like the Fed was no longer asleep at the wheel, I'm once again convinced that they are beginning to unlearn what I thought they had learned the hard way... through almost $500 billion in losses that I firmly believe could have been avoided, had the Fed taken swift action...

The worry for them, once again, unbelievably... inflation. The same excuse they used to avoid dealing with the problem when it first surfaced... But, and I'll say this real slow for the benefit of the Fed and the Treasury Department for that matter... You cannot fight inflation, and stop a housing depression at the same time... You can't be worried about both simultaneously. If they continue to take the... let-them-have-their-cake-and-eat-it-too approach, our economy is headed straight for the financial guillotine...

Last year was the year to cut rates big!... And let people re-finance their mortgages and give the banks a chance to play the yield curve to rebuild capital... a la 1990... a scenario we've outlined repeatedly on Mad Money...

We all know the story... we know what they did... They blew that chance to avert the crisis because they were worried about, yes, inflation... Bernanke and the rest of the Fed... You see, they're trying to take a middle road that does not exist... They have no conviction, and maybe no idea of the consequences of their actions... They just keep vacillating, putting out different stories, giving different speeches... failing to fix inflation or the housing-induced recession... but they don't get it...

If they want to fight inflation... if that is Bernanke's chief goal, then here's what he needs to do...

Frankly, he needs to destroy the economy, in order to save it...

He needs to make people so poor, that they can't afford to pay for gasoline, because this particular strand of inflation is energy-based, not wage cost or housing-related.

Now the government could take care of a big chunk of food inflation by killing that nasty and stupid ethanol mandate, where we trade 30% of our corn... what the animals eat... chicken, beef... for 3% of our gasoline... That's right. And I believe that federal policy... mandated by the President and supported by congress... is causing the real inflation for food... That's why the July 4th barbecue is going to be so tough... the same with Father's Day...

And, at the same time, we have the Federal Reserve that's noodling on whether to raise rates and level the economy to fight that inflation...

All right, if they urged the elimination of corn-based ethanol, they would do more for the cause of lower inflation than they would by raising rates... and they'd also have the added advantage of not increasing the likelihood that you'd lose your job.

What we have now is a choice. And it's a choice neither the Federal Reserve nor the Treasury Department seems willing to make... They can either cut down inflation and take in exchange what I expect to be a severe recession... absolutely maul American businesses... so they will use less energy... brutalize the American homeowner, so he can't pay his mortgage... and then merge all the banks, as they start to fail, under the weight of all these defaults...

Or they can solve the housing conundrum first, and put the rate hikes in a drawer until we're finished.

You see, they're trying to do both, but that's simply impossible. They want to be tough on oil-based inflation, which won't work... and bet that the housing depression is over. That's a bad bet.

These problems have to be tackled sequentially or they won't be tackled at all... One or the other... they've got to pick. I hear them all day on our network... they're saying both.

There have been some benefits from their indecision for Cramericans... the bull market in energy and energy-related stocks that have to go higher with the commodity. If Bernanke wants to raise interest rates to kill that, and to create mass unemployment, that's his prerogative. It seems he can't make up his mind.

It shouldn't be this way... these guys are supposed to be clued in... but it is. And it has been... We can't keep denying the obvious. They haven't been able to choose between trying to stop oil inflation, and trying to combat house price depreciation, and that's the most dangerous non-choice of all.

So we have a nonsensical policy that seeks to create inflation and kill it at the same time... one that I believe will result in the worst alternative... both inflation and recession.

 

.  .  .  .  .

The Bottom Line!:      I'm convinced that, as long as Bernanke and Paulson think they can take on oil-based inflation with higher interest rates, and the housing crisis, at the same time... with lower interest rates... we're in trouble. I think we'll be better off when they recognize that you have to cure one before you can cure the other. They should stop speaking out of both sides of their mouths. And speaking as someone who doesn't want to see the economy devastated... with millions of people losing their homes, and millions more losing their jobs... I prefer if they cure housing first.

.  .  .  .  .


 

   
 

Stock Snapshots - Includes all stocks mentioned above

 

 

Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock

STOCK
SYMBOL

Closing
price
that
day

Opening
price
next
day

Full Company Name/Comments
(see comments above for each)


na

na

na

na

 

 

Go to the LIGHTNING ROUND from tonight's show here >>

See current quotes on Yahoo! Finance from tonight's show stocks here >>

Symbol keys:

A Charitable Trust stock. - An asterisk next to a stock symbol indicates that Jim mentioned it is a stock that he manages within
his charitable trust portfolio.  You can see the complete portfolio
of stocks here >>

Thumbs up - indicates he would buy the stock or, at the very least, not sell the stock.  We do our best to interpret Jim's opinion on stocks, as we think it is indicated by his comments during the show.  Please read his comments to decide for yourself.

Thumbs down - indicates he has said not to buy or to sell the stock, based on his comments  We do our best to interpret Jim's opinion on stocks, as we think it is indicated by his comments during the show.  Please read his comments to decide for yourself.

Back up the truck - indicated by Jim, when he says the stock is so good, that he would do a 'mon-back' on the stock... In other words, this is the sound someone would say to a truck driver, "Come on back... " as he is "backing up the truck" to load up on his cargo.  Translation for buying stocks:  This recommendation by Jim indicates that, after you do your own homework on the stock, you should feel comfortable loading up on it, as it is in a good position to be bought at this point.

Stumped. - Of the 2,000+ stocks that Jim Cramer has in his head, for which he has an informed opinion, he sometimes comes across a caller with a stock he does not know well enough to opine on...  He then indicates he is stumped and will have to come back to it, after he does some homework of his own on the stock.  This usually occurs during the Lightning Round, when Jim does not know in advance who is calling, or what their stock question is about.
 

 
Definitions of key phrases used by Jim, known as "Cramerisms":

Definition:   'Pull the trigger' is Jim's phrase for making the decision at that point to trade - either to 'buy' or to 'sell' (although he usually uses the phrase for buying), as if to say you should feel comfortable enough to make the final decision without looking back...

Definition:   'Ring the Register' is Jim's phrase for selling a stock, and making it a final sale, that you should not look back on.  Put it behind you.

Definition:  'Let It Come In' indicates how you may wait for it to pull back, or have the stock price come down briefly, as your chance (after letting it come in) to buy the rest of your position (i.e., total number of shares you own in that stock).

Definition:  'backing it up' or 'doing a 'mon-back' is Jim's phrase for the metaphor of backing up a truck to load up on a stock by buying it.  'Mon-back is short for the imaginary worker saying, 'Come on back...' as the truck is backing up to receive its load... Notice that we use the little truck icon to indicate where Jim has mentioned this.  Translation for buying stocks:  This recommendation by Jim indicates that, after you do your own homework on the stock, you should feel comfortable loading up on it, as it is in a good position to be bought at this point.
  See more "Cramerisms" & other financial phrases here >>
   
Helpful Websites:
  See the stocks currently known to be in Jim Cramer's
Charitable Trust at:

jim-cramer-charitable-trust-stocks.com

 
See the stocks currently known to be in Warren Buffett's portfolio
of stocks at:

warren-buffett-portfolio.com

 
  Stock Homework 101:   This is an excellent upcoming site that provides resources and links to help you do that homework that Jim Cramer recommends after hearing his suggestions...

StockHomework101.com

This site is coming soon.   Thank you.

 
  FastMoneyRecap:   This site will be a quick summary of recommendations made by the great Fast Money TV show crew, that will offer you a unique service, to compare their picks to Jim Cramer's past comments about those stocks.

Fast Money Recap - Trades for next day...

Compare these picks to Jim's comments for the same stocks.

 

 

   
   
  © 2005-2007 MadMoneyRecap.com ■ Important disclaimer: This site is not affiliated with Mr. James Cramer, and is not associated with any television networks or broadcasts. Please note that all thumbs up or thumbs down indicators are not always clearly indicated on the show and are interpreted by us as accurately as possible. Some comments have been edited for brevity and clarity, and extraneous material omitted.  Please rely on watching the show yourself, doing your own homework, and reading the text of the comments to draw your own conclusions. Also, data presented on this site should not be used to make investment decisions and accuracy, although attempted, cannot be guaranteed.  Please consult with your own financial advisor for professional advice.
 
 

 

 
       

Feedback   ■   Terms of use   ■   Privacy Policy  ■   Keep this site Free