Monday, 06/16/08
Posted 06/16/08,  11:11 pm ET

(Scroll down to see Jim's comments below)

 
 
Today's date:  Monday, 06/16/08

  Dow Jones: 12,269    - 38
  NASDAQ:   2,474    +20
  S&P 500:   1,360    + 0
 
 
 
 
 
First Segment
 
Opening Segment 1 Title: 'Sirius Discussion'

.  .  .  .  .

Featured Stock(s): Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. (SIRI)

See SIRI's official website here.

See the Yahoo! Finance profile for SIRI here.



See Opening Segment 2, below...
 
After this segment, you can see Jim's Lightning Round picks here...

        
JJC:    At long last!... At long last, it looks like the tyranny of terrestrial radio may finally come to an end!...  That the FCC will agree to what the Department of Justice's Anti-Trust division ruled in March... that the merger of Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. (SIRI) and XM Satellite Radio (XMSR) is not monopolistic, and should be allowed to go through!

Now that the chairman of the FCC, Kevin Martin, has expressed his approval for the merger, you'd think it was pretty much of a done deal, right? I'd like to hope so but, if there's one thing I've learned from the saga of SIRI and XMSR, it's that there's always another obstacle lurking... as the opponents of the deal are so entrenched that they're likely to do anything to put a stop to it.

.  .  .  .  .

There is no issue I've been more of a crusader on than this one, as this government has allowed so many of what are, in my opinion, anti-competitive deals, through over the last 20 years of laissez-faire anti-trust... Oh, but when it came to SIRI and XMSR... so scary and so dangerous!... All of the sudden, our regulators decided to get tough on anti-trust...

This is a deal that's taken longer... precisely one year and 119 days... had more congressional hearings... four hearings... than what I think was the completely anti-competitive - and you know it, because you pay at the pump - Exxon/Mobil deal... In our infinite wisdom as a government, we thought that Exxon/Mobil was less of a danger to you than XMSR and SIRI... and why?... Because the National Association of Broadcasters, the lobbying arm of terrestrial radio, has been throwing money at congress!... And, in addition, silently blackmailing every elected official with the potential threat of a vocal radio... vocal radio... going against them during the next elections.

All right, don't get me wrong... they're not actually blackmailing anyone, but what congressmen want... What congressman would want the local radio stations to turn against him?... something they could do, if that congressman supports this dreaded, anti-competitive, dangerous deal...

.  .  .  .  .
 

But now... Now everything comes down to five people, step-by-step, inch-by-inch... There are five people. The five members of the FCC (i.e., Federal Communications Commission) and, since we know that Kevin Martin, the chairman, is in favor of the deal, that leaves us with four. We need two more votes in the FCC besides Martin's. And I think it's very doable, given the fact that the FCC is slit 3 to 2, in favor of the GOP...

We've got one vote from the chairman. I'm betting Commissioner Copps - a democrat - votes against, as he has said in the past that he is not convinced the merger should be allowed to proceed. He's irredeemable.

Then there's Commissioner Adelstein... the second democrat... who thinks the FCC should consider the concerns of the State Attorneys General on the deal. Okay, wait a second... I mean, this is the most national deal... XMSR and SIRI, they're nationwide. The federal Justice Department has said it's okay it is nationwide. No... He wants to go with the State Attorneys General. Why not break it down even further... how about getting some input from the mayors?...

Now, there are two likely votes against... but Commissioner McDowell... This guy, well he said the market seems to be larger than just satellite radio... something we've said on this show from (the start)... I mean, he's including iPods, terrestrial radio, CD players... this guy must have kids right... So, he's a likely yes. Commissioner McDowell, you've got horse sense.

Okay, that leaves Commissioner Tate, the woman in the picture, as the arbiter of the fate of this most important deal. Yes... not just the arbiter of this merger because, if it doesn't happen, at least one these companies will go under... probably XM...

.  .  .  .  .

All this deal does is insure a viable competitor to terrestrial radio. If anyone's behavior has monopolistic, it's the old-fashioned radio companies trying to destroy a new source of competition.

This is about whether we have satellite radio period, so Commissioner Tate, I beg you... I beseech you... please support this deal! Tate's a republican. I know she wants to do the right thing. We're counting on her to make it happen. If Tate plays ball, then Mel Karmazen (CEO of SIRI) gets this deal done. We're going to see a radical change in the way these companies do business.

The auto companies, for instance... the chief market for satellite radio companies... have pitted these two players against each other mercilessly. So has talent, major league baseball, football, golf and Cramer-fave, Nascar... I think Mel will change all that, paying less for programming and getting more from the auto companies for each satellite radio. Mel is money...

.  .  .  .  .


But the real benefits of this deal, in terms of revenue and cost, I expect, are going to come down the road. They don't mean much immediately, because of the three-year (freeze) on prices. No. What matters in the near term is one thing... refinancing. Both companies are always in danger of running out of money and, as separate competitors, it's hard for them to borrow... but the equation changes when SIRI and XMSR merge. Then they can go hat in hand to Wall Street, with a good bond deal that people will no longer worry about defaulting. That's why, combined, these stocks are so good... right here, right now.

There's no quick way to monetize the two companies when they combine though. It isn't a short-term gain. The approval process should boost prices briefly, but the combined Sirius/XM will be a terrific long-term play, a dominant company that will pretty much destroy terrestrial radio. This may be the biggest reason the radio stocks continue to trade down, and CBS continues to be brought down by its radio division...

People hate commercials. They will flock to a viable satellite alternative.

Now here's the bottom line...

.  .  .  .  .

The Bottom Line!:      Commissioner Tate... Our nation turns its lonely eyes to you... we're banking on you.  I ask you... Should we be forced to only have terrestrial radio?...  Or can we let Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. (SIRI) and XM Satellite Radio (XMSR) combine, so that consumers can have a choice between free commercial radio... filled, of course, with commercials...  and paid commercial-free radio.  I'm betting this deal goes through, and I maintain that, together, Sirius and XM will be a powerhouse.  Maybe not immediately, but soon.  And, somehow, I think the merger will be more consumer friendly than that terrific Exxon/Mobil combo, which sailed through antitrust without much of a problem.

.  .  .  .  .

 

   
 

Stock Snapshots - Includes all stocks mentioned above

 

 

Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock

STOCK
SYMBOL

Closing
price
that
day

Opening
price
next
day

Full Company Name/Comments
(see comments above for each)


SIRI

2.62

2.65

Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. (SIRI)


 

 



See all of tonight's stocks' latest quotes on Yahoo! Finance



Most popular
investing books ordered:
(click any book to see at Amazon.com)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 


 

 


We need your help!
If you find our service valuable, your donation is critically helpful to support
our operating costs and is MUCH appreciated!
(click below to donate)

We are serving thousands of new visitors every day and our costs are growing as well.  Thank you for your support & generosity!


 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 
 
 
i

Mutual-Fund-Holdings.com
NEW RESOURCE!  See Ken Heebner's CGM Focus Fund
Top 25 holdings - The No. 3 Top-Performing Mutual Fund in 2007


 
 
Second Segment
 
 
Opening Segment 2 Title: 'Triple Charged'

.  .  .  .  .

Featured Stock(s): Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile (SQM)

See SQM's official website here.

See the Yahoo! Finance profile for SQM here.

 
After this segment, you can see Jim's Lightning Round picks here...



JJC:    We're getting down to Chile today... to celebrate an economy that is pants-ing ours on a daily basis...

And a Chilean company that is the triple-play of stocks...

It's got Latin America going for it...  It's got agriculture going for it...  And it's got batteries going for it... the kind of lithium-ion batteries we're developing for hybrid cars, and plug-in batteries to take advantage of off-peak energy generation...  storing the excess energy for peak hours, instead of letting it go to waste...

Why Chile?...

This is the capitalist Chile!... Not the socialist Chile...

While our country is expected to grow GDP (i.e., gross domestic product) at 1.2% this year... and how paltry is that?... we're pathetic!...  Chile posted a GDP growth of 4%... just in the last quarter of 2007.  It's expected to put up 3.8% GDP growth this year.

While budget deficit equivalent in size to 2.4% of GDP, Chile has a budget surplus that's 7% of its GDP... 

Our trade deficit?...  $831 billion.   Chile's trade surplus... $19.1 billion.

How about some insult to injury?...  The Chilean peso has appreciated 8%, versus the dollar in the last year.

Now, look, I'm always saying that you need at least 20% of your portfolio in foreign stocks, and this is the reason why foreign countries are kicking our collective economic butts!...

And my favorite Chilean company...  not the phone company, which I like very much...  This one is what I call the triple-play of stocks... is...

Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile (SQM)...  The Chemical and Mining Company of Chile, if you're a stickler for translations.

.  .  .  .  .

Now, SQM has been a perennial favorite of Cramer... I've been recommending this one for literally since 2005... First, it was at $11.47... Then, on August 21st of 2006, at $10.79. It came back on November 27th of 2006, at $13.20... as well as other side recommendations and countless other buy, buy, buys...

The stock is now at $47 bucks... So, we're up 311%, 337%, and 257% respectively... Two quadruples and a triple, and I'm not done...

SQM has been a huge winner for you, and I think it keeps on winning... because SQM is the true triple-play stock. We already have the Latin thing, which everybody seems to love right now. Then there's the ag exposure... agriculture. The company is 49% agriculture, making half of the world's potassium nitrate... half! This is the fertilizer used in the planting of fruits and vegetables. It's in competition with POT... the fertilizer, not the company, with potassium nitrate, right now, being the cheaper fertilizer. That's why we're shifting over to this.

.  .  .  .  .

Given the global fertilizer shortage, with Cramer-faves, Potash (POT), Agrium (AGU), and Mosaic (MOS)... all hitting 52-week highs today, I think potassium nitrate prices and, by extension, SQM, will start playing catch-up...

And then there's the third part of the SQM triple-play... batteries! That's right, batteries!

SQM is the largest producer of lithium in the world, and it's expanding lithium production by 40% in the second half of the year. Can you imagine?...

.  .  .  .  .

This company really is without rival as a lithium producer. Even if, right now, lithium only makes up 15% of its revenues, I predict it's going to become a much, much bigger portion of SQM's business.

Lithium demand has grown at a 7.5% clip. I see that increasing to about a quarter of the world's use for batteries. And, since lithium-ion batteries seem to be poised to be the foundational technology for true plug-in electric cars... which you know is the way to beat OPEC... and environmentally-friendly hybrids... which you know is the way to cut down on emissions... not to mention plug-in batteries that utilities can use to capture excess energy produced during non-peak hours, then pour it back into the grid during peak times...

This seems like a good time to be the world's #1 source of lithium, doesn't it?...

.  .  .  .  .

Hey, today, I get up... what do I hear?... Samsung and Bosch, in South Korea just announced a joint venture today to produce lithium-ion hybrid vehicle batteries by 2010... Hey, that's right around the corner. This is just one more lithium battery initiative that could make SQM all the more attractive...

Now, despite the fact that SQM has been an incredible performer that's got its hands in what I think are two of the most fabulous growth areas right now... It remains an unloved stock on Wall Street...

There is very little U.S.-based research, despite the fact it's a $12 billion company that I think is of supreme importance, given its prominent position as the world's #1 purveyor of lithium. SQM is unloved on Wall Street, because of its ownership structure... with Julio Ponds and Potash owning 62% of SQM's stock.

I don't care! That may scare the Street away, but it doesn't scare Cramer!...

.  .  .  .  .

This is just too good an opportunity to pass up... It's in Latin America, it's a fertilizer company, it's part of the ag bull market, and it is a source of the substance that should be the future of batteries in automobiles... lithium!

.  .  .  .  .

The Bottom Line!:     
I think that you should say, "Si" to Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile (SQM)!...

.  .  .  .  .

 

   
 

Stock Snapshots - Includes all stocks mentioned above

 

 

Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock

STOCK
SYMBOL

Closing
price
that
day

Opening
price
next
day

Full Company Name/Comments
(see comments above for each)


SQM

47.16

49.64

Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile (SQM)

 

 

Go to the LIGHTNING ROUND from tonight's show here >>

See current quotes on Yahoo! Finance from tonight's show stocks here >>

Symbol keys:

A Charitable Trust stock. - An asterisk next to a stock symbol indicates that Jim mentioned it is a stock that he manages within
his charitable trust portfolio.  You can see the complete portfolio
of stocks here >>

Thumbs up - indicates he would buy the stock or, at the very least, not sell the stock.  We do our best to interpret Jim's opinion on stocks, as we think it is indicated by his comments during the show.  Please read his comments to decide for yourself.

Thumbs down - indicates he has said not to buy or to sell the stock, based on his comments  We do our best to interpret Jim's opinion on stocks, as we think it is indicated by his comments during the show.  Please read his comments to decide for yourself.

Back up the truck - indicated by Jim, when he says the stock is so good, that he would do a 'mon-back' on the stock... In other words, this is the sound someone would say to a truck driver, "Come on back... " as he is "backing up the truck" to load up on his cargo.  Translation for buying stocks:  This recommendation by Jim indicates that, after you do your own homework on the stock, you should feel comfortable loading up on it, as it is in a good position to be bought at this point.

Stumped. - Of the 2,000+ stocks that Jim Cramer has in his head, for which he has an informed opinion, he sometimes comes across a caller with a stock he does not know well enough to opine on...  He then indicates he is stumped and will have to come back to it, after he does some homework of his own on the stock.  This usually occurs during the Lightning Round, when Jim does not know in advance who is calling, or what their stock question is about.
 

 
Definitions of key phrases used by Jim, known as "Cramerisms":

Definition:   'Pull the trigger' is Jim's phrase for making the decision at that point to trade - either to 'buy' or to 'sell' (although he usually uses the phrase for buying), as if to say you should feel comfortable enough to make the final decision without looking back...

Definition:   'Ring the Register' is Jim's phrase for selling a stock, and making it a final sale, that you should not look back on.  Put it behind you.

Definition:  'Let It Come In' indicates how you may wait for it to pull back, or have the stock price come down briefly, as your chance (after letting it come in) to buy the rest of your position (i.e., total number of shares you own in that stock).

Definition:  'backing it up' or 'doing a 'mon-back' is Jim's phrase for the metaphor of backing up a truck to load up on a stock by buying it.  'Mon-back is short for the imaginary worker saying, 'Come on back...' as the truck is backing up to receive its load... Notice that we use the little truck icon to indicate where Jim has mentioned this.  Translation for buying stocks:  This recommendation by Jim indicates that, after you do your own homework on the stock, you should feel comfortable loading up on it, as it is in a good position to be bought at this point.
  See more "Cramerisms" & other financial phrases here >>
   
Helpful Websites:
  See the stocks currently known to be in Jim Cramer's
Charitable Trust at:

jim-cramer-charitable-trust-stocks.com

 
See the stocks currently known to be in Warren Buffett's portfolio
of stocks at:

warren-buffett-portfolio.com

 
  Stock Homework 101:   This is an excellent upcoming site that provides resources and links to help you do that homework that Jim Cramer recommends after hearing his suggestions...

StockHomework101.com

This site is coming soon.   Thank you.

 
  FastMoneyRecap:   This site will be a quick summary of recommendations made by the great Fast Money TV show crew, that will offer you a unique service, to compare their picks to Jim Cramer's past comments about those stocks.

Fast Money Recap - Trades for next day...

Compare these picks to Jim's comments for the same stocks.

 

 

   
   
  © 2005-2007 MadMoneyRecap.com ■ Important disclaimer: This site is not affiliated with Mr. James Cramer, and is not associated with any television networks or broadcasts. Please note that all thumbs up or thumbs down indicators are not always clearly indicated on the show and are interpreted by us as accurately as possible. Some comments have been edited for brevity and clarity, and extraneous material omitted.  Please rely on watching the show yourself, doing your own homework, and reading the text of the comments to draw your own conclusions. Also, data presented on this site should not be used to make investment decisions and accuracy, although attempted, cannot be guaranteed.  Please consult with your own financial advisor for professional advice.
 
 

 

 
       

Feedback   ■   Terms of use   ■   Privacy Policy  ■   Keep this site Free