Tuesday, 08/26/08
Posted 08/26/08,  09:15 pm ET

(Scroll down to see Jim's comments below)

 
 
Today's date:  Tuesday, 08/26/08

  Dow Jones: 11,412   + 26
  NASDAQ:   2,361    -  3
  S&P 500:   1,271    + 4
 
 
 
 
 
First Segment
   
Opening Segment 1 Title: 'Home Schooling'

.  .  .  .  .

Featured Stock(s):

Home Depot (HD)
See HD's official investor relations' site here.
See the Yahoo! Finance profile for HD here.

and...

Lowe's
(LOW)
See LOW's official investor relations' site here.
See the Yahoo! Finance profile for LOW here.


See Opening Segment 2, below...

 
After this segment, you can see Jim's Lightning Round picks here...


Jim:   We've decided to do something new on Mad Money...  In case you missed our shows last week, because a couple of guys were hitting each other (i.e., Olympics boxing, et. al. that pre-empted Jim's 6pm show the last two weeks)...

We're teaching you how the professionals value stocks, so you can do it at home.  Yeah, it's D-I-Y time... 

We've been using head-to-head comparisons of companies in the same business...  to show you how professionals value each stock in relation to others in the overall market.

Today, I want to take steps...  I want to go further...  I want to talk to you about the concept of "key metrics"...   Let's translate that...  let's bust that Wall Street jibberish...

The Street uses different yardsticks to evaluate different kinds of stocks...  You see, when we're looking at a stock and comparing the two, you need to know which yardstick to use.  You can't just use, oh, how were the sales, and how were the earnings...  no.  Each industry has a particular metric that we all measure them by...

If we were talking retailers, you would want to look at what's known as "same store sales"... How did that store do last year versus this year?...  Why do we care about that?  Because, if you add a whole bunch of stores, and you just looked at total sales, it's misleading...  If you put up 100 (new) stores, you're numbers are obviously going to be better.

Now, that's the key metric for retail.  How about restaurants?... 

For restaurants, we want to figure out how much they can control their raw costs...  That's exactly what made us disrespect Burger King (BKC) last week.  We thought they wouldn't be able to control it.  It turned out to be a prescient call, because that was the metric that the Street cares about.

Now that we think housing is going to bottom in 309 days...  keep your eye on that countdown... maybe it's time to revisit the two titans of home improvement...

Lowe's (LOW) and the Home Depot (HD)...  which have already bounced 34% and 26% from their bottoms, respectively...  much like the housing charts that I showed you...

What we want to know is, first...  Should we buy either of these companies?...  And, second... looking at their key metrics, for their industry... retail... which of these two stocks is the better one to buy?...  And this is not an easy one, okay...  especially because you have to kind of anticipate that the housing situation might improve, as we are 309 days from now...

First off... We always start in the same place when we try to value stocks like a money manager... we use this 10-point scale... and that's with the sector. You must know where the sector is in the economy first, before you pick a stock...

Now, the sector, if it's in a charmed place like the drug stocks, that's worth up to five points, because half of a stock's performance is predicted from the sector. You can't have a great house (i.e., your stock) in a bad neighborhood (i.e., the sector) and make money. You need the worst house in a great sector, a great neighborhood that makes money.

HD and LOW aren't plain old retailers. They're home improvement stores that are unfortunately very much tied to the strength of the housing industry...

Now you know my stance on housing... we've got 309 days until the industry bottoms... which means that, when it comes to the sector, LOW and HD will be in a better place in the future than they are right now. That's a hindrance to their stocks. Even though both companies just beat earnings, a sign that the Street had gotten too negative on the business, I think that home retailers are not a great business right now. What they are is really a 2, with 1 being the big cyclical stocks, the worst right now... 2, and they're moving to a 3... Remember, that's out of a 5-point per sector.

So let's split the difference...

We think that these guys are getting... should get 2.5 points each... that the sector is in motion, going from a 2 to a 3... and, over time, that number will definitely move higher as we get closer to the housing bottom. As usual, we've got a tie, because the sector is the same, right... This gets 2.5 and this gets 2.5, because they're in the same sector...

Now, for the head-to-head comparisons, where we always start with growth, because that's what money managers care about more than any other factor. Growth, growth, growth...

If you're watching the show, and you care about one thing... Cramer likes to look at growth for good stocks. That's the point.

For retailers, the key metric that measures growth are, as we said, same-store sales. And we also need to look at market share growth... Remember, these guys are going head-to-head, so if this guy's doing well, maybe this guy's doing badly. It's a little zero-sum in this industry...

And saturation... that's another key metric for retailers. How close is the company to filling the country with stores, so that it can't grow anymore?... Remember TGT last week? They're in 47 states, and they're having trouble growing.

Ed. note:
How do LOW and HD stack up using these:

1. Same-store sales growth
2. Market share growth
3. Saturation of stores domestically/globally


Jim:   On same-stores, LOW reported a 5.3% decrease last quarter. It sounds bad, but the Street was expecting an 8% decline... And LOW raised guidance, and told the analysts that they were too negative. That's the first time in a long time. Not to mention they did a 16% earnings beat. It was a good quarter for LOW, given the situation. Some of it was the (federal tax $600) rebate... Don't worry about that. HD got the rebate too...

Alright, HD... Same-store sales shrank by 7.9%. Again, people were looking for 10%, so a little better... but it's worse than the numbers LOW put up...

Remember, we're doing head-to-head... I think we have to give LOW 1 point here. And I'm willing to give a half point to HD, because it did come in better-than-expected and beat the earnings estimates, what the Street had, by 15%.

So now the score is 3.5 (points) for LOW, and 3 for HD.

How about market share?...

This is really important, because these companies are going head-to-head in real life.

LOW is taking share. HD's losing it. LOW took share in 17 of its 20 product categories. Boy, is this recession made for them. They gained 120 basis points, or 1.2% of market share. HD lost share in 8 of 13 categories.

Another point to LOW, okay...

So now you're looking at 4.5 for LOW, 3 for HD. So LOW is widening its lead.

How about room for growth (i.e., saturation)?...

HD has an amazing number of stores. 2,234 stores. I think they actually have too many... mostly in the U.S., but some in Canada, Mexico and China... HD expects to open 55 new stores, but last quarter it opened net zero stores, because it closed 15 underperforming ones. That's actually good, believe it or not.

Now, LOW only has 1,575 stores... some in Canada, the rest in the U.S. LOW expects to open 120 stores, 7-8% growth in square footage... and it opened 23 stores last quarter.

Let's give LOW another point, because it has much more room to grow. It has the upper hand in terms of store growth and, if the (housing) industry is close to a bottom, that's really good news.

So now LOW is now 5.5. Little HD is 3.

HD does have the superior dividend... it yields 3.3% and LOW is only 1.4%... but wait a second... HD is once again the despot in the category, but let's only give it a half a point, and I'll tell you why in a second... We're only going to give this one a half a point, because it's dividend is bigger. Well, the reason why that is, quite frankly, is because the stock fell so much. That's why the yield is so big...

Now, here's the conundrum... Even though LOW is clearly the better company, it's got a price-to-earnings multiple of 15.5%... HD's multiple is slightly lower at 15.3%.

I would not touch HD with a 10-foot pole. LOW, on the other hand, looks pretty attractive... especially on a pullback...

I mean, look at this... 5.5 (points)... to 3.5 (points), but their multiples are roughly similar...

That means you buy LOW.

If I were at my hedge fund, and I never recommend short selling... but I would probably be buying LOW and selling (short) HD...

Here's the bottom line...  

.  .  .  .  .

The Bottom Line!:     If you think the home improvement market is improving, the stock to own is Lowe's (LOW), not Home Depot (HD).

 

   
 

Stock Snapshots - Includes all stocks mentioned above

 

 

Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock

STOCK
SYMBOL

Closing
price
that
day

Opening
price
next
day

Full Company Name/Comments
(see comments above for each)


HD

27.02

na

Home Depot (HD)


LOW

24.56

na

Lowe's (LOW)

 

 



See all of tonight's stocks' latest quotes on Yahoo! Finance



Most popular
investing books ordered:
(click any book to see at Amazon.com)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 


 

 


We need your help!
If you find our service valuable, your donation is critically helpful to support
our operating costs and is MUCH appreciated!
(click below to donate)

We are serving thousands of new visitors every day and our costs are growing as well.  Thank you for your support & generosity!


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

Mutual-Fund-Holdings.com
NEW RESOURCE!  See Ken Heebner's CGM Focus Fund
Top 25 holdings - The No. 3 Top-Performing Mutual Fund in 2007


 
 
Second Segment
 
Opening Segment 2 Title:

'Bottom Feeding'

.  .  .  .  .

Featured Stock(s):

General comments regarding the housing market.  No new stock picks.

 
After this segment, you can see Jim's Lightning Round picks here...


Jim:    When can housing bottom?...

That's the $52,000 question... it's the one everyone asks me, because I believe we need housing to bottom, before we can start seeing the economy roar again...

So, when will it happen?... When have I been saying it will happen?...  When have I been consistently saying it will happen?... 

On the record, I say the third quarter of next year... we will be going back... we will have bottomed... a year from now.  And, yeah...  I'm being precise.  Why?...

I have ten reasons why it could happen...

.  .  .  .  .

But first, why am I even bothering to call the bottom now, one year out?...

You have to do it that way, because I think you can't ignore the stock action... You can't turn a blind eye to the bottoming process of the stocks...

That means talking about a subject that I usually avoid on this show... not because it's really hard to get good charts... but the charts do show something... they are just too obvious when it comes to the housing stocks...

The charts are fabulous predictors whenever they are doing something en masse... when you see all the housing stocks peak, or when you see all the housing stocks bottom...

To me, or to anyone frankly, they're telling an accurate story...

So let's do something I typically don't do... let's go to the charts of the seven most important homebuilders in the United States from January of 2005, to show you what I'm talking about...

.  .  .  .  .

Look at the charts of:

Pulte (PHM)
Toll Brothers (TOL)
DR Horton (DHI)
KB Home (KBH)
Lennar Corp. (LEN)
Centex Corporation (CTX)
MDC Holdings Inc. (MDC)

Remember, this is a five-year chart, okay...

Now, you can see the pattern so clearly by going back on a five-year chart... These stocks... I mean, this is incredible. It's very rare that you see it this crystal clear... These stocks peaked right here (pointing to the top point in the chart for all of the listed stocks together). There is no issue. This is no more difficult than seeing the peak of Mount Everest...

These stocks peaked one year before housing hit the wall... one year... one year before the July 2006 beginning of the end... They nailed the top one year in advance... these stocks screamed that we were at a top...

And I am now telling you that they are screaming that we are at a bottom...

Now you've got what I've got in my head. They've clearly bottomed in July. So, here... why should we think they are wrong now, when they were right back then?...

These stocks predicted something. I mean, it was unbelievable how right they were in 2005, predicting the 2006 top...

How can I say they won't be right in 2008, predicting the 2009 bottom?...

Do not discount the charts as being pure hocus-pocus... It's not!

.  .  .  .  .

Now usually my experience is that stocks predict things out six months... If you went and looked at a chart of Exxon Mobil (XOM) for instance, six months ago... you would see that it was predicting precisely that oil would peak at $140. Boom! Just when it peaked, okay...

Now, meaning that, if look at stocks as an indicator of where a business or the economy will be, typically in six months, they'll steer you right most of the time... So stocks usually let us see six months into the future...

But I did not say that housing will bottom in... six months. It's going to be 12 months. The truth is, I'm being more cautious here, than what the stocks usually say, because housing's been such a hard call. I think I'm being conservative. I don't want to be premature. It's too ghastly out there... especially since it took a year between when the housing stocks peaked in 2005, and the housing business peaked in 2006. I think the trough will take a year too.

So, once again, let's understand, because there's been a lot of misinterpretation of my call... and I read the websites and I know what people are saying... they're saying, he's calling a bottom again... No. I have consistently said that the bottom is out a year... I wanted to show you exactly what I saw in the charts... how the stocks told me, boom! In 2005, how we were headed to a peak, and now, boom, how in 2008, they're telling me we're heading into a trough in 2009.

.  .  .  .  .

Now, how about my credentials?...

I have been an inveterate bear when it comes to housing. In 2005, on this set, I had loud disputes with the heads of almost all the major housing companies, when I was calling a top... Two of them got two heated and there were incriminations. These people who ran these companies in 2005 could not have disagreed with me more. They were bullish. I was looking at the charts and the peak, and I said, something's wrong here. On air, last year though, I promised... when everyone felt that things could be bottoming... I guaranteed, both on the Today show and here, that you would lose money if you bought a house... last September...

By the way, that sparked a gigantic letter-writing campaign by the National Association of Realtors to get me fired... I understand that. I probably would have tried to do the same if I was in real estate... I would have said I've got to get that guy Cramer to shut up. I get that. That's okay. I'm a big guy. I don't mind people coming after me. But you've got to understand... you've got to understand that no one else came on your air and said, you will lose money with your house, because they were either too politically correct, or they feared people. I don't. My credentials are clear. And for those of you who are spoofing me and chiding me... that's a constant... I look at the critics. I know when they're louder than a Who concert... but I urge you, after what I told you... I risked being fired after telling the truth about housing... I risked being the wrath of all these CEOs who I'm supposed to be trying to be friends with, which I'm not... and now I am telling you that you can laugh all you want at me, but the charts are not lying... I urge you to find someone with better bonafides on housing who is in TV or who is in real estate... Try it. Try it...

Now I am saying that one year out that we will get a bottom... How can that be so heretical, really though?... How can it be so dumbfounding?...

.  .  .  .  .

Listen, besides the charts and their forecasting abilities, I've got 10 fundamental reasons why I think housing will bottom in the third quarter of 2009...

1. We're building far fewer homes than we used to.

In 2005, we were building far more homes than we should... When those charts were peaking, we were putting huge numbers of houses... twice the number of houses they're building now they were building in 2005. That was a heads up.

2. How about the housing bill that authorized $300 billion in FHA loans?

No one even seems to talk about that. That will give troubled homeowners a chance to stay in their homes. The FHA is going to take your terrible floating-rate loan with a high rate, and give you a loan with a fixed rate that will be cheaper, so you can work it out and stay in your home.

3. Prices have come down to the point where there are actual bargains.

We saw some numbers yesterday, down an average of 7%. We saw some other numbers today from S&P that are down huge. We're talking about homes being down 30-40% in the hardest hit areas... and I believe, in a year, they'll be down 50%. So you're worried about a down payment? Well, wait a second... well, guess what, when the house is $200,000 (instead of $400,000), you don't have to put up that much. The S&P housing numbers we saw today are breakout. They were showing 25% declines in many areas... a reduction that makes housing affordable, at last, compared to renting... and, in my bottoming scenario, they will be more affordable next June and July.

4. The last holdout markets - think New York - seemed to have peaked a few months ago.
The Hamptons are down big. I am looking in the Hamptons, and I hate the Hamptons... When the last area rolls... I'm seeing the bottoming process starting in earnest.

5. Right now, mortgage rates are going up month-to-month. That's a bummer. But, if and I think this is more of a when... FNM and FRE get nationalized, rates should go down, making it cheaper to buy a home.
This is a sticking point. FNM and FRE must be nationalized. Now we know from Barron's that there's a plan to do this...

6. The bulk of the reckless loans... you know, the ones with the low teaser rates... they're going to reset in the third quarter of this year.
Because they peaked in the third quarter of 2006, when the wall was hit. The number of mortgages changing to a much higher rate will be down from here... Down from here on out, so the rate of foreclosures should slow dramatically next year. That's how you get a bottom.

7. There's such a thing called household formation.
There are about 860,000 new households that get formed every year. Listen, there are 4 million babies born every year in America... we've got the divorce thing going on... we've got 2.5 million new citizens. All of these things create demand... These people have been camped in apartments, saving up for down payments long enough! How long can you live with your mother-in-law! Alright, that trumps any housing crisis... take it from me.

8. Immigration.
It has been at a million people per year, but that number got a big haircut, because of the presidential crackdown. It should grow back with the new president, be it McCain or Obama, both of whom are more immigrant friendly than the current guy.

9. The biggest problem in areas for housing are contained, now that California, Florida and Arizona... it's not spreading.
In fact, lots of regions stopped going down, or they're just going down fractionally. The big losses are apparently being cordoned off.

10. The worst areas... Bradenton in Florida, the central valley of California... they've bottomed.
They bottomed a couple of months ago. They were the areas with the most foreclosures. The first to fall is usually the first to return. Next I think we will see Miami and the inland empire, which is really ground zero, bottoming. Then we are going to be in the third quarter of 2009, and I believe that the bottom will be at hand for everything.

Here's the bottom line...  

.  .  .  .  .

The Bottom Line!:     I am reiterating my stance that housing will have bottomed by this time next year.  "In Charts I Trust"... so let's start the countdown...  We've got 309 days until June 30th of 2009.  We've got 309 days until housing bottoms, and I will eat this cardboard if I am wrong...

 

   
 

Stock Snapshots - Includes all stocks mentioned above

 

 

Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock

STOCK
SYMBOL

Closing
price
that
day

Opening
price
next
day

Full Company Name/Comments
(see comments above for each)


na

na

na

General comments regarding the housing market.  No new stock picks.


       

 

 

Go to the LIGHTNING ROUND from tonight's show here >>

See current quotes on Yahoo! Finance from tonight's show stocks here >>

Symbol keys:

A Charitable Trust stock. - An asterisk next to a stock symbol indicates that Jim mentioned it is a stock that he manages within
his charitable trust portfolio.  You can see the complete portfolio
of stocks here >>

Thumbs up - indicates he would buy the stock or, at the very least, not sell the stock.  We do our best to interpret Jim's opinion on stocks, as we think it is indicated by his comments during the show.  Please read his comments to decide for yourself.

Thumbs down - indicates he has said not to buy or to sell the stock, based on his comments  We do our best to interpret Jim's opinion on stocks, as we think it is indicated by his comments during the show.  Please read his comments to decide for yourself.

Back up the truck - indicated by Jim, when he says the stock is so good, that he would do a 'mon-back' on the stock... In other words, this is the sound someone would say to a truck driver, "Come on back... " as he is "backing up the truck" to load up on his cargo.  Translation for buying stocks:  This recommendation by Jim indicates that, after you do your own homework on the stock, you should feel comfortable loading up on it, as it is in a good position to be bought at this point.

Stumped. - Of the 2,000+ stocks that Jim Cramer has in his head, for which he has an informed opinion, he sometimes comes across a caller with a stock he does not know well enough to opine on...  He then indicates he is stumped and will have to come back to it, after he does some homework of his own on the stock.  This usually occurs during the Lightning Round, when Jim does not know in advance who is calling, or what their stock question is about.
 

 
Definitions of key phrases used by Jim, known as "Cramerisms":

Definition:   'Pull the trigger' is Jim's phrase for making the decision at that point to trade - either to 'buy' or to 'sell' (although he usually uses the phrase for buying), as if to say you should feel comfortable enough to make the final decision without looking back...

Definition:   'Ring the Register' is Jim's phrase for selling a stock, and making it a final sale, that you should not look back on.  Put it behind you.

Definition:  'Let It Come In' indicates how you may wait for it to pull back, or have the stock price come down briefly, as your chance (after letting it come in) to buy the rest of your position (i.e., total number of shares you own in that stock).

Definition:  'backing it up' or 'doing a 'mon-back' is Jim's phrase for the metaphor of backing up a truck to load up on a stock by buying it.  'Mon-back is short for the imaginary worker saying, 'Come on back...' as the truck is backing up to receive its load... Notice that we use the little truck icon to indicate where Jim has mentioned this.  Translation for buying stocks:  This recommendation by Jim indicates that, after you do your own homework on the stock, you should feel comfortable loading up on it, as it is in a good position to be bought at this point.
  See more "Cramerisms" & other financial phrases here >>
   
Helpful Websites:
  See the stocks currently known to be in Jim Cramer's
Charitable Trust at:

jim-cramer-charitable-trust-stocks.com

 
See the stocks currently known to be in Warren Buffett's portfolio
of stocks at:

warren-buffett-portfolio.com

 
  Stock Homework 101:   This is an excellent upcoming site that provides resources and links to help you do that homework that Jim Cramer recommends after hearing his suggestions...

StockHomework101.com

This site is coming soon.   Thank you.

 
  FastMoneyRecap:   This site will be a quick summary of recommendations made by the great Fast Money TV show crew, that will offer you a unique service, to compare their picks to Jim Cramer's past comments about those stocks.

Fast Money Recap - Trades for next day...

Compare these picks to Jim's comments for the same stocks.

 

 

   
   
  © 2005-2008 MadMoneyRecap.com ■ Important disclaimer: This site is not affiliated with Mr. James Cramer, and is not associated with any television networks or broadcasts. Please note that all thumbs up or thumbs down indicators are not always clearly indicated on the show and are interpreted by us as accurately as possible. Some comments have been edited for brevity and clarity, and extraneous material omitted.  Please rely on watching the show yourself, doing your own homework, and reading the text of the comments to draw your own conclusions. Also, data presented on this site should not be used to make investment decisions and accuracy, although attempted, cannot be guaranteed.  Please consult with your own financial advisor for professional advice.
 
 

 

 
       

Feedback   ■   Terms of use   ■   Privacy Policy  ■   Keep this site Free