|
Opening Segment #3: |
 |
'Outrage
Of The Day'
'Madoff
Madness' |
 |
|
Monday,
January 05, 2009 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jim:
Even If Madoff
Didn’t Make Off With
Your Money, There’s
A Lesson In This
Scandal For The SEC
& You
This is the outrage
of the year.. Short
year. How about of
the decade?
According to today’s
Wall Street Journal,
our buddy pal friend
Bernie Madoff… was
investigated by the
SEC eight times over
the last 16 years.
They made multiple
examinations, and
they found nothing
except minor
infractions… That
seems pretty amazing
to me. See we did
own analysis of
Madoff’s strategy,
piecing together
reports from his
clients… and then
looking at the
actual returns would
have been from the
split/strike
conversion strategy
he claimed to be
using… And as it
turns out, not only
should it have been
a piece of cake…
ghetto… to figure
out that Madoff was
lying, but the
strategy he was
using , frankly, was
really, really
awful. A true
underperformer
anyway you cut it…
memo to the SEC, you
should take out a
pencil and paper at
this point, so you
know how to do your
job in the future... |
|
See comments continued below...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monday,
January 05, 2009
(Cont'd from
above)...
Jim (cont'd):
From the
beginning of
2000 to October
of 2008, almost
9 years of data…
If you would
have actually
followed the
strategy Madoff
said he was
using.. You
would have been
down about
2.66%.. That is
right, down
2.66%… Of
course, from the
clients
statements,
Bernie claimed
to be up 80%
over that
period. At best,
if you follow
the Madoff
strategy from
the beginning of
2000, you would
have been up 23%
in November of
2007... I loped
of the bad year…
That’s 23%
total, over 8
years. Not
compounded. Over
and over again,
we have heard
that this is
really great
strategy if
Bernie had
actually used
it. Now we know
that it is BS of
the first order…
It is better
than investing
in Zimbabwe,
maybe… But not
the first
national bank of
Seeley.. Now I
have a new
Stearns & Foster
mattress, that
set me back
about $2000...
And if I had
bought the
Duxianas from
Fuji’s, I would
have done better
that if I
followed
Madoff’s
strategy. His
clients should
be banking at
1-800-MATTRESS,
and leave the
“s” off for
savings… In fact
they would have
done better
banking with
Castro… of the
convertible
nature of
course… Now
wonder the guy
was allegedly
running a Ponzi
scheme… Hey I
got this, this
is another way
to invest better
than Madoff..
Look at this, do
the rich get
richer. Of
course, it also
said “This
ticket for
entertainment
purposes only.
Thanks for being
a good sport”...
▼ ▼
▼ ▼
▼
Long term, anybody who actually
tried to duplicate what Bernie
was doing…. Something that I
think the SEC should have been
given…. They would have known
what I found out. They would
have known the guys results were
fabricated. All the SEC had to
do was to look up the
performance of the options
Bernie said he was trading, and
see what returns they could have
generated to figure this out. So
the next time someone from the
SEC or one of these Feeder
funds… that invested in Madoff,
claim that they had no way of
knowing… that they were
defrauded too… that is me
raising an eyebrow, that is what
they tell you to do when you go
to TV class, they say don’t say
someone is lying, say it raises
eyebrows…
You know that is completely
bogus. All they had to do was
look at the strategy, because
the strategy stunk… two raised
eyebrows… Seriously, they just
had to get the numbers from
Bloomberg, and then use the
Microsoft excel mate… Maybe they
were excel challenged… But in
all of there investigations, the
SEC never did anything like
that. The examinations always
took the form of trying to see
if Madoff was running the head
of the orders from the brokerage
arm of his business… something
that would have given the
investment arm an edge, but
zapped the brokerage side of
profits. They were worried that
he was ripping off his brokerage
customers… when in fact, the guy
was robbing his investment
clients. I used to trade with
him all the time when I was at
the hedge fund… they were fine.
It should have been enough that
SEC’s Boston office got letters
complaining about a potential
Ponzi scheme. But even that
didn’t get them to actually
examine the strategy Madoff was
claiming to use, as we did.
According to the journal the SEC
did compare 4 whole days with
the customers statements with
the strategy Madoff described…
and it all checked out. Why
didn’t they compare it with the
performance of the actual
options that the guy traded… I
have no idea. We looked at close
to 9 years worth of data. The
SEC looked at 4 days worth, and
even then not even…. How about
this? … Anecdotal evidence… When
I set up my little dinky hedge
fund in 1982 out of my law
school dorm, and registered as
an investment advisor with the
SEC, they called me in.. Jack
boots to the Boston SEC office
almost immediately. And they
grilled me.. I kept waiting for
the rubber trench or hose,
whatever they call it… about how
I intended to make money. And
what kind of record keeping I
had… Mister Cramer we will get
you to talk. Looks like what
they did was they cracked down
on the Cramers of the world… the
USS Minnow… but gave the Titanic
a free pass… they tried to bring
down the professor, perhaps with
Mary Ann… but they looked
askance at the millionaire and
his wife.
Now if the SEC was bad, some of
the Feeder funds that invested
with Madoff look even worse. Now
I have never liked these kind of
fund guys, with the exception of
Poshner Alexander, because they
always inquired thoughtfully
about what I was doing… that was
the only good kind of fund to
fund in. The other guys, they
seem like parasites, like
cockroaches… These funds
invested their clients money
with Madoff, they had all the
time in the world to figure out
what he was doing, just like we
did. They didn’t even try. One
of the funds, Tremont, actually
included this clause in the
documents they sent to their
clients. I want you to write
this one down cause it is just
too outrageous. “In addition
information supplied by the
investment advisor may be
inaccurate or even fraudulent.
The co-managers are entitled to
rely on such information,
provided they do so in good
faith. And are not required to
undertake any due diligence to
confirm the accuracy thereof.”
.. Not required to undertake any
due diligence… They are
basically saying that we got no
responsibility, we don’t have to
do a darn thing… we got no
responsibility at all. It’s not
our job. You have to wonder if
they knew Madoff was full of it,
given that they threw that
clause in… And to think that
they were paid fortunes for
this, I find it hilarious… they
ought to be drummed out of the
business… Well, can you call it
they are doing a business..
Here’s the bottom line...
▼ ▼
▼ ▼
▼
The Bottom Line!:
The SEC, the Feeder
funds that gave
Madoff the money.
They have no
excuses. They could
have adopted a
"Duxiana" (hide all
your money away in a
mattress) strategy…
They knew his
alleged strategy,
they could have just
tired to replicate
it like we did…. And
known he was a
fraudster. Instead,
the SEC the
repeatedly failed to
notice one of the
allegedly biggest
Ponzi schemes in
history, and the
theatre funds who
gave him money
washed their hands
of any and all
responsibility…
bravo guys…. Truly
outrageous.
No excuses...
If I can do the
math, then the SEC
can, Madoff should
have been charged
long ago.
Read Jim's next Segment
here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Search for Jim's past comments about a specific
stock. Use
ticker symbol or company name in quotes
(e.g., GOOG or "Google") |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|