|
Opening Segment #3: |
 |
|
'Off The
Charts' |
 |
|
Wednesday,
February 18, 2009 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jim's
rating on
this stock |
STOCK
SYMBOL |
Closing
price that
day |
Full Company Name |
|
 |
IBM |
91.51 |
|
I’m not a
chartist, but
I’ll play one on
TV if it means
you could make
Mad Money...
Jim:
On this
show, we believe
that if we learn
about a company we
can figure out where
its stock price is
going… that makes us
fundamentalists… not
like Cotton Mather
or the Iokoa… for
some cross religious
diversity… but more
like Benjamin
Graham, or
Warren Buffett…
although I don’t
know what the heck
Buffett is doing
selling stock in all
of these great
American companies,
after he wrote that
op-ad in The New
York Times telling
people to buy
American companies….
anyway, there is
another camp of
people with a
different investing
philosophy… they
think that they can
predict where a
company is going
just by looking at
where a company has
been… these people
are called
technicians, they
are called
chartists… now in
normal times I think
that technical
analysis is just a
bunch of mumbo
jumbo…. if not
chicken jumbo… with
nothing but a
t-shirt on and no
halo… to mix
Cramer’s faves,
Campbell, Shontelle,
and Beyonce… I think
technical analysis
is a different kind
of
Wall Street jibberish
that works
until it doesn’t…
but these are not
normal times… these
days all the big
money plutocrats are
looking at the
charts… trying to
divine where their
stocks will go… we
believe in knowing
what is popular in
the Wall Street
fashion show… how
fitting that it is
fashion week… and
right now charts are
in vogue… Anna
Winter is a
chartist… lose the
sunglasses lady... |
|
See comments continued below...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday,
February 18, 2009
(Cont'd from
above)...
Jim (cont'd):
Alright, so
today we are
going off
the charts
to look at
real
household
technology
consulting
names that
have been
tearing up
the joint…
I am talking
about
IBM (IBM)…
According to
Dan
Fitzpatrick,
my colleague
at
TheStreet.com,
where I am
chairman…
Dan, a great
technician
who is our
go to guy
when it
comes to
analyzing
the charts…
he says IBM
looks real
good… the
stock has
been below
its 50 day
moving
average… a
technical
term that
tracks how
close a
stock has
hugged its
short term
trajectory…
okay, here
we go… but
now it is
above that
line… and
now it is
above that
line… and
even though
the 50 day
moving
average is
going
higher…
IBM’s pull
backs have
all ended
above it…
they are all
hanging in
there… now,
that is the
kind of
thing that
shows up on
scans that
traders use
to find up
trending
charts…
chart
watchers
want to own
stocks that
are as what
is known as
being above
their 50 day
moving
average… and
where that
moving
average is
moving
higher… as a
closet
technician
you should
know that I
favor the
200 day
moving
average,
harder to
manipulate,
I think more
of a true
measure of a
stock… but
remember I
am not a
technician,
I am going
to go with
what these
guys say.
Now in early
October, IBM
sold off on
what was
very, very
large
volumes…
this is a
little
indicator of
bottom, it
just goes
like this
and then
spikes okay…
remember for
technicians
volume skips
the Miranda
warning and
goes right
to the
polygraph…
high volume
means truth…
it means a
move is
telling the
truth… and
low volume
like what we
had here, is
lying…. then
the stock
hit its mid
November low
on heavy
volume…
okay, right
here… but
lighter than
in October…
so the
volume here
if you take
a look was
not equal to
the spike
here, that
spike was
more than
that… since
then … yes,
this is what
they think
is
important, I
am just
telling you
what they
think is
important…
since then
IBM has been
moving
higher… that
means
according to
the
technicians
that the
stock has
been dumped
by everyone
that wants
to sell… and
now the
buyers are
in charge…
now look at
the huge
spike in the
volume in
mid January…
that is the
largest one…
that
coincides
not with the
sell off,
but with
huge rebound
the next
day… chart
watchers
would tell
you that
this is a
sign of
strength…
where buyers
completely
overwhelmed
the selling,
and still
wanted more…
IBM closed
at its
intra-day
high that
day…
indicating
that they
buying
persisted
throughout
the day…
another
thing that
they like to
see…
technicians
will say
that this is
a fairly
reliable
indicator
that the
tide has
turned and a
stock is
going
higher.
Now, how
would
technicians
tell if IBM
would keep
trending
higher… look
at what is
known as the
resistance
line…. one
of the first
sign for
chartists
that a trend
is in
trouble is
when a
stocks
current peak
doesn’t run
high enough
to touch an
existing
trend line…
that
indicates to
them that
buyers are
losing
interest…
losing
interest in
paying more…
or the
owners are
becoming
more willing
to sell…
IBM’s peak
keep tagging
that
resistance
line…
meaning the
trend should
be in tact….
the problem
with just
looking at
charts is
that as soon
as IBM stops
being able
to touch
that line…
when it
rallies… the
reason to
own the
stock
evaporates…
so you know
what I am
worried
about… you
would have
bought high
and sold
low… that is
a cardinal
sin
according to
the cannon
of all stock
investing…
at least
according to
REAL Money,
the book,
now
available in
paperback.
So, how
about the
fundamentals…
is there a
reason to
own this
stock based
on the
underlying
business…
and I think
tech is
going to be
weak
tomorrow… so
focus, this
could be the
trade … I
think there
is a reason…
in fact I
think the
earnings
here are
what is
driving all
of this
technical go
end trail
reading… in
other words
you don’t
need a Ouji
board to
know which
way the wind
blows…
because that
big spike in
January that
Fitzpatrick
liked so
much… right
here… well,
guess what…
that is when
IBM reported
its monster
good
quarter… in
an earnings
season full
of
disappointments
and full on
implosions…
IBM bucked
the trend…
beating the
streets
consensus
estimate by
.25 cents,
and earning
$3.28 in the
fourth
quarter…
right there,
that is what
we got… the
company said
that it
expects to
earn at
least $9.20
this year…
.45 cents
above the
streets
consensus….
between $10
and $11 in
2010...
visibility…
even though
IBM’s end
market looks
weak…
remember
this company
doesn’t make
PC’s… and it
is a company
that saves
other
companies
money… 75%
of its new
service
contracts
will deliver
cost savings
to
customers…
that is how
it will
thrive in
this awful
environment…
everyone
else is
trying to
cut costs…
for that you
turn to IBM…
I also bet
they will be
able to take
some share
courtesy of
the fallout
of the
mechanics
scandal at
Satyam… that
is the
Indian IT
and
consulting
company,
Satyam is
the Indian
version of
Stanford, if
not Madoff…
this is not
your
father’s or
even your
older
siblings
IBM.. the
company has
$117B
backlog,
that is big,
in its
services
business…
IBM is now
more of an
outsourcing
and
consulting
company than
a
traditional
tech
hardware
company… it
gets 80% of
its revenues
from
services and
software…
and
recurring
revenue from
these
businesses
make up for
about half
of IBM’s
total
revenue… we
like
recurring
revenue
because it
can mean
stability
and it gives
you
visibility…
IBM with
around $13B
in cash on
the balance
sheet is one
of the few
companies
out there
that can
return money
to you, a
shareholder…
pre cash
flow is up
15% in 2008,
to $14.3B…
and the
company is
continuing
to buy back
stock
aggressively…
it
repurchased
90 million
shares, or
$10.6B worth
in 2008...
it still has
another
$5.6B left
in the buy
back… and a
little yield
2.1%, puny
compared to
the
accidental
high-yielders
we like… it
is still a
pretty good
tech stock…
better yet,
IBM has the
cash to
raise that
dividend if
it wanted
to.
Bottom line…
Jim's
comments AFTER the
interview:
Okay, look…
absolutely the chart
looks good… the
fundamentals look
great… and that is
why I think IBM…
especially on
weakness tomorrow…
if you can get this
below $90... that
would be a gift…
IBM (IBM)
is a buy, buy, buy.
At last! The
fundamentals & the
technicals are in
sync! I think IBM’s
a buy!...
[verbatim recap]
▼ ▼
▼ ▼
▼
Jim went on after
this segment to take
questions from
callers, and
responded with his
comments...
```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Q:
I have been a few
large, mid and small
cap companies on my
radar screen. And
almost without
exception, Jim, they
are fluctuating by +
- 2 to 5% multiple
times throughout the
same trading day.
And Nokia is one of
them, I have never
been accustomed to a
stock that gaps up
or down by 3% each
am. It is very
frustrating. It has
million of dollars
in market cap, net
worth swings daily,
do company
fundamentals mean
anything to anybody
anymore Jim?
Jim: I
mean… remember, we
know… Nokia is a
company that is very
honest, and tells us
that the
fundamentals are
that great… remember
they cut the
dividend… it is
difficult for me to
champion a stock
when management is
so cautious… so I
think the
fundamentals do mean
a lot… but
unfortunately the
fundamentals for
Nokia are bearish.
```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
[verbatim recap]
[end of segment]
Read Jim's next Segment
here
▼ ▼
▼ ▼
▼
Read Jim's next Segment
here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Search for Jim's past comments about a specific
stock. Use
ticker symbol or company name in quotes
(e.g., GOOG or "Google") |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|