|
Final
Segment #1: |
 |
'Mad Mail'
|
 |
|
Wednesday,
February 25, 2009 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Viewers ask, Cramer
answers...
Jim:
See all Mad
Mail -
viewer email
questions
below...
|
|
Continued below...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday,
October 22, 2008
(Cont'd from
above)...
▼ ▼
▼ ▼
▼
Jim (cont'd):
|
Jim's
rating on
this stock |
STOCK
SYMBOL |
Closing
price that
day |
Full Company Name |
|
 |
EPD |
21.21 |
|
'Mad
Mail'
Enterprise Products Partners
LP (EPD)
Q:
Hey Jim,
I bought Enterprise Products
Partners for its nice yield, but
the most recent dividend came
into my account as a dividend,
and then a few days later was
adjusted to be a Return Of
Capital. Should I take this as a
sign that EPD can’t afford to
pay its dividend any longer, or
should I just consider it a
short-term economic/accounting
issue? I thought the tax
treatment of dividends wasn’t
announced until the end of each
fiscal year, so my gut reaction
was to take this as a very
negative news.
-- Summer
Jim:
Now, I
went to my
friend Rich
Steinberg,
at Merrill
Lynch, who
knows this
group more
than
anybody… I
have known
him for the
last 25
years… and
it is a sign
of nothing…
it just
happens to
be a
mis-mark… it
is a return
of capital…
it comes out
as a
dividend…
but don’t
think of
anything
other than
the fact
that these
stocks have
been going
down in part
because they
had a very
good first
part of the
year… but
there is no
sign of any
stress at
EPD… and
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners
(KMP)
remains my
favorite but
yours is
pretty darn
good too… I
would be a
buyer.
|
|
|
 |
KMP |
48.05 |
|
'Mad
Mail'
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners
(KMP)
See EPD
comments
above for:
KMP
|
|
|
 |
na |
na |
|
'Mad
Mail'
General
question...
Q:
Jim,
With the
earning hits
and
potential
insolvency
of major
corporations
and State
governments,
combined
with the
recent major
drop in
security
prices in
which the
pension
funds my be
invested,
how secure
are pension
payouts to
current (and
optimistically
future)
retirees?
Will this be
the next
economic
shoe to
drop?
-- Ron
Jim:
Ron,
first of all
no state has
ever went
bankrupt, so
let’s
remember
that before
we get to
panicky…
second, I am
far more
concerned
about the
annuities at
several of
the major
life
insurance
companies
than I am
about the
pensions
from
individual
states… why,
because the
states can
raise taxes…
the pension
annuities
cannot…
because they
are private
companies…
so let me
just say
that in my
list of
parade of
horribles…
that one is
really near
the end of
it… because
I have got a
list that is
as long as
your arm.
|
|
|
 |
PG* |
49.92 |
|
'Mad
Mail'
Procter & Gamble (PG*)
Q:
A few
weeks ago you said you couldn’t
recommend Proctor & Gamble
around $60, but if it were to
dip to around $53, you would
call it a buy. Then, on a more
recent episode, you recommended
selling PG at around $49. Can
you explain your though process
that led you to this conclusion?
What made it attractive 3 weeks
ago at $53 and a sell now at
$49?
-- Brian
Jim:
Well,
what I said
was that if
it went much
lower it
would be
good and I
used $53...
and then the
company
reported…
really just
an awful
quarter… it
was an awful
quarter… and
you know
what, this
is like the
Foster-Wheeler
I mentioned
earlier…
these
companies
come out
there with
these really
bad
quarters…
like John
Menerchains,
I have to
change my
mind if the
fundamentals
change…
Proctor just
did not do a
good job…
and I love
the company…
just not the
stock.
|
|
[verbatim recap]
[end of segment]
Read Jim's next Segment
here
▼ ▼
▼ ▼
▼
Read Jim's next Segment
here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Search for Jim's past comments about a specific
stock. Use
ticker symbol or company name in quotes
(e.g., GOOG or "Google") |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|