|
Monday,
March 9, 2009
(Cont'd from
above)...
Jim:
Mr. Rogers welcome
to Mad Money...
Rogers:
I am delighted to be
here Jim. Thank you
so much for asking
me to join you
today.
Jim:
Alright, Mr.
Rogers, if I am a
customer of Duke
Energy… and I am
very
pro-environmental…
do I have any idea
whether I can afford
to give to my
favorite
environmental causes
if I use Duke Energy
3 years from now?
Rogers:
I think one of
the key things that
we are trying to do
is to get a
transition to a low
carbon rural. To
minimize the impact
on our consumers,
and to smooth out
the impact on them,
as we deal with what
is inevitable, and
that is carbon
legislation in this
country.
Jim:
If I were a big
buyer of bonds… an
institutional buyer
of bonds, and I read
the plan of
cap-n-trade, and you
guys needed money to
roll over your debt,
I would not buy your
bonds because I fear
that you would be
put out of business.
Rogers:
Well, that
would be wrong. For
a couple of reasons,
last year we went to
market and raised
$4.5B, that is $1.5B
more than any other
company in our
sector. We have a
very strong balance
sheet.. We operate
in states that
understand what the
mission is, and that
is affordable,
reliable clean
electricity 24 by 7.
And we are going to
be able to do that.
My mission is to
minimize the cost
impact on our
consumers.
Jim:
Now, is it
true, we had the
Dominion folks last
week… that some
people saw this
revolution ahead of
others, and that you
guys were not ahead
of the bubble?
Rogers:
I would say
that, I don’t know
if we were behind or
ahead, but let me
just quickly tell
what we have done.
And you make the
judgment about this.
Jim:
We will let our
viewers, because you
have become hotter
than I am… which is
saying something my
friend.
Rogers:
No, not at
all, but let me give
you the story. You
talked about the
wind, you talk about
energy efficiency
and we are leading
the country with our
save-a-watt proposal
that will change the
investment paradigm
for energy
efficiency for
utility companies.
We are investing in
solar, we have got a
proposed nuclear
plant in Cherokee
county, 2200-
mega-watts, and we
are in the first
wave of plants to be
approved by the NRC,
so we are leading
there. We are also
building two coal
plants, which has
gotten all the
headlines. But here
is the reality about
that, the coal
gasification plant
will be the cleanest
coal plant in the
country. It will be
the largest coal
gasification plant
in the world. We are
going to do
destructization there,
its leading the way
to the new
technologies that
will allow us to use
coal, our most
abundant resource in
America. Our plant
in North Carolina,
Cliffside, is going
to allow us to
retire 1000
megawatts of old,
not retrofitted
plants, and the
bottom line there is
that our socks nocks
mercury, our
pollutant footprint,
will be smaller and
the carbon intensity
of our business
today, we are number
9 out of the large
power companies in
America, which means
that 8 companies
have greater carbon
intensity than we
do. We will reduce
it 10% by building
these two coal
plants. So my
judgment is that we
are ahead of the
curve because we are
modernizing our
fleet with more
efficient plants, we
are investing in
renewables, we are
investing in energy
efficiency. And the
other, and probably
most important thing
is, that we are
trying to shape the
legislation in a way
to minimize the
impact on our
consumers.
Jim:
Why didn’t… we
have a big glut of
natural gas in this
country… why didn’t
you do Cliffside
with natural gas?
Rogers:
One because
I believe having
been in the gas
industry, and having
run the pipeline
companies in the
past, I believe that
in time gas prices
will be driven up.
We have a over
capacity of L&G
today, around the
world, gas prices
are at low levels
but I remember that
just a year ago when
they were $11 and
$12. It is my
believe long term,
one of the reasons
that our rates our
lower than virtually
most utilities in
the country is that
96% of our
electricity comes
from nuclear and
coal, not gas. Gas
prices are more
volatile, yes they
have a less of a
carbon footprint
than coal, but at
the end of the day
it will be more
expensive to take
carbon out of gas
than it will out of
coal. So from my
standpoint,
depending on gas
runs a great risk
for our consumers
long term. The
better place to be
is to be with
nuclear and clean
coal.
Jim:
On our show we
have done a series
of I think pretty
decent technology
work with a lot of
the public
companies, and no
one, even the CEO of
Foster Wheeler, who
I think builds the
best coal boilers,
fluid coal… believes
that there is such a
thing right now as
clean coal, maybe
cleaner coal but he,
I think that he
would tell you, that
even with his modern
technology they are
not there yet.
Rogers:
We are not
there yet, and
frankly, we are
probably 15 years
away from being able
to commercialize.
But the way that I
look at it, and Jim,
a way to think about
it is simply this.
If I look between
now and 2050,
virtually every
power plant that I
own today will be
retired and
replaces. So during
that period of time,
I can reduce the
carbon footprint of
my generation fleet
as these
technologies evolve.
The important thing
is selecting the
right technologies
in the right
sequence. And today
the only power
source that we have
that can provide
power 24 by 7 with
zero greenhouse gas
is nuclear.
Jim:
Okay, one last
question… and I know
that we all have to
run… you said 2050
would be fine… if
you had to put a
date about wear
Obama believes it
should be, would it
be closer to 2050 or
2015?
Rogers:
I think at
the end of the day
he believes that he
thinks we should
reduce omissions 80%
by 2050. He
understands the long
term nature of this.
What I worry about
is how the
transition occurs,
and people having
unrealistic
expectations as to
what can get done by
2015. And quite
frankly, there is a
lot of people that
think we can do this
just with
renewables, just
with energy
efficiency, we can’t
and have a strong
growing economy.
Jim:
Excellent,
thank you for
pointing that out.
Jim Rogers, the Duke
CEO, thank you so
much for coming back
on the show.
Rogers:
Thank you.
▼ ▼
▼ ▼
▼
Jim's
comments AFTER the
interview:
I think he is a
realist… I mean do I
like
Duke Energy (DUK) more than
Dominion Resources Inc. (D)… no, cause
we heard from
Dominion and they
were a different
product profile… but
you heard what he
said.. the bills are
going up… it is not
a great thing for
the consumer… it may
be better for the
environment… you
make the judgment
whether you ought to
own Duke.
[verbatim recap]
Read Jim's next Segment
here
Read Jim's next Segment
here
|