|
|
|
|
Monday,
October 22, 2008
(Cont'd from
above)...
▼ ▼
▼ ▼
▼
Jim (cont'd):
I don’t understand
this at all… I have
got to thank my
sister, the original
negative Nancy, for
pointing out the
contrast, and of
course, my nephew
and writer, Cliff
Mason, for pointing
out on his
“Millennia Money”
blog, must read, on
CNBC.com… we heavily
regulate the
casinos… where you
know you are going
to lose a lot money
anyway, because the
house almost always
wins… except when I
play, because I am
real good at Black
Jack… we know that
the casinos are
picking your pocket…
you know when you go
in there… but on
Wall Street where
you should be able
to make money… where
we are supposed to
catch alleged
thieves like
Stanford and Madoff…
the regulators
barely have any
teeth… certainly not
as tough as they can
be in Nevada.
The SEC has
something like 3700
employees right now…
Obama only asked for
a 13% increase at
the SEC… right
direction… remember,
I am with Obama, we
are all Obamans on
this one… but that
is barely even a
real start… how
about a 3000%
increase in head
count… I am not
kidding… that would
give us the added
advantage of putting
lots of jobless
white collar workers
to work… they can’t
all make bridges I
am telling you… the
Brooks brothers
crowd is not going
to be in there with
the jack-hammers…
also this would give
a financial system
that hopefully won’t
blow up quite so
spectacularly in the
future… we need more
guys who have traded
too with the SEC…
and they know where
the bodies are
buried… as well as
more lawyers to make
cases… it should not
be harder to get a
darn gaming license
than it is to
register as a
investment advisor…
that is ridiculous.
Does this mean that
as a culture we
really take gambling
more seriously than
investing… is it
more important to us
that the casinos
which always win
anyway, don’t cheat
us that extra little
bit, than to prevent
any cheating at all
on Wall Street… what
is the justification
here… do we think
that the casinos are
more likely to cheat
their patrons then
Wall Street… how
could we believe
that now… is it
because people
expect to lose their
money, but expect to
make money in
stocks… not lately…
maybe because it is
more fun to gamble
while playing Black
Jack, or Poker but I
don’t think so…
probably because
there is alcohol
involved when you
gamble… this market
is causing plenty of
people to drink a
lot of scotch on the
dirty linoleum
floor… if you as me,
there is no rational
than for regulating
the casinos more
heavily than we do
Wall Street… other
than, it is easier
to do… and that is
not much of one.
Look at the total
lazy-fare lack of
regulation on Wall
Street has brought
us… at this point I
think most people
feel that putting
their money in the
market is less
legitimate and fair
than your average
game of roulette…
not to say
Russian-roulette…
that is what
investing feels like
lately.
Here is the bottom
line…
▼ ▼
▼ ▼
▼
The
Bottom Line!:
If we have the
manpower and the
political will
to regulate the
gambling
industry… then
let’s police
Wall Street at
least as heavily
as we regulate
the casinos…
that way it can
feel more than
just gambling
and the American
people won’t
have the sense
that the people
at the brokerage
house always
win.
[verbatim recap]
[end of segment]
Read Jim's next Segment
here
▼ ▼
▼ ▼
▼
Read Jim's next Segment
here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Search for Jim's past comments about a specific
stock. Use
ticker symbol or company name in quotes
(e.g., GOOG or "Google") |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|