|
Final
Segment #1: |
 |
|
'Mad
Mail' |
 |
|
Thursday,
June 4, 2009 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
Mad Mail...
Viewers
write in to
ask stock
questions...
and Cramer
answers...
(below)
See viewer email
questions below, and
Cramer's answers on
whether or not he
likes the stock in
question, or general
market comments...
|
|
Continued below...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thursday,
October 22, 2008
(Cont'd from
above)...
▼ ▼
▼ ▼
▼
|
Jim's
rating on
this stock |
STOCK
SYMBOL |
Closing
price that
day |
Full Company Name |
|
 |
na |
na |
|
'Mad
Mail'
General Question...
Q:
Booyah
Jim!
I can’t seem to reconcile in my
mind your aversion to placing
stop-loss orders instead of
“schintzeling” a portion of a
holding (or half in the case of
a double) to preserve some
profits. Either approach
preserves some profits, but a
stop-loss order preserves the
potential upside gain if the
stock continues to climb. Please
explain again why you don’t
recommend using stop losses.
Rick
Jim:
Funny
you sent this, my friend Matt
Horwein, who is one of my
associates and does some
accounting for me, was saying
that I ought to suggest this
tonight for the sell block… that
maybe there are a lot of stocks
that have moved up, people
should be selling… I agree that
you should always be taking
profits… we have had a very big
run… I am concerned about
stop-loss orders because in an
extremely volatile market, this
is less volatile than it was a
month and half ago, you could
literally be picked off…you put
a stop-loss order in for Exxon
at $69, touches $69 and goes
back to $72... and you say why
did I do that, why did I not
just monitor it myself… volatile
markets mean that you have to be
a little more hands on when you
want to sell, and a stop-loss
takes that out of you… but I
still think that Matt Horwein is
right, that into this strength
you should be lightening up on
some stuff… there are still
things that are going wrong.
|
|
|
 |
JPM* |
35.35 |
|
'Mad
Mail'
JPMorgan (JPM*)
Q:
Cramer,
You’ve been talking a lot about
taking profits and playing with
the house’s money. you have also
recommended buying small amounts
of good companies instead of
many shares of a dog. My
question is where do the two
meet? If I only had enough money
to buy a few shares of a great
company like JPMorgan, which had
a monster move this spring, how
do I protect my gains without
losing all of my position?
Mark
Jim:
Mark,
great question… I address this
in
Real Money: Sane Investing In An
Insane World, you have 100
shares of JPMorgan, you take 25
shares off up 10 points, and
then you take another 25 shares
off about another 10 points, and
then the rest is playing with
the house’s money… you do not
need to sell anymore… that is
why I favor my so called sell
out position… that is what
works… if you still have
problems understanding the scale
out… get
Sane Investing In An Insane
World.
|
|
|
 |
TQNT |
5.07 |
|
'Mad
Mail'
TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc.
(TQNT)
Q:
Jim,
I have my eye on TriQuint Semi.
It’s balance sheet isn’t
impressive, but considering its
chips are currently being used
for
the iPhone & multiple models
of the Blackberry, is it a smart
pin action play?
- Brandon
Jim:
Brandon,
we have said over and over again
that neither TriQuint nor
RF Micro Devices Inc. (RFMD)
is as good as
Skyworks Solutions Inc. (SWKS),
that is why we invited David
Aldridge on… may I remind people
that
QualComm Inc. (QCOM*)
remains my favorite in the
group, they are going to have
bust out earnings… we saw that
today from a number of trade
papers… QCOM, that is why I own
it
ActionAlertsPlus.com, my
charitable trust… it
is my largest position, and you
heard it, and my subscribers
have heard it… I am not selling.
|
|
|
 |
QCOM* |
45.29 |
|
'Mad
Mail'
QualComm Inc. (QCOM*)
See TQNT
comments above for:
QCOM*
|
|
[verbatim recap]
[end of segment]
Read Jim's next Segment
here
▼ ▼
▼ ▼
▼
Read Jim's next Segment
here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Search for Jim's past comments about a specific
stock. Use
ticker symbol or company name in quotes
(e.g., GOOG or "Google") |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|